Key result
Percutaneous coronary revascularization significantly increased mean local shortening from 6.0% to 9.7% (P<0.001) and decreased electromechanical mismatch regions from 38% to 10% (P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does percutaneous coronary revascularization improve electromechanical mapping parameters in patients with prior myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=15)
Does percutaneous coronary revascularization improve electromechanical mapping parameters in patients with prior myocardial infarction?
Absolute Event Rate: 9.7% vs 6%
p-value: p=< 0.001
Successful percutaneous coronary revascularization improves mechanical function and reduces electromechanical mismatch in patients with prior Q-wave myocardial infarction, while electrical activity remains unchanged.
May support mechanical recovery after PCI in chronic MI; hypothesis-generating for electromechanical mapping utility.
Percutaneous electromechanical mapping was applied to evaluate the impact of coronary revascularization on electrical and mechanical parameters in patients with prior myocardial infarction. In 15 patients with prior (> or = 4 weeks) myocardial Q-wave infarction and regional wall motion abnormalities, left ventricular endocardial mapping was performed immediately prior to percutaneous coronary revascularization. Patients underwent repetitive mapping during 6-month follow-up angiography with good revascularization results in all patients. Mean regional unipolar electrogram (UP) amplitude of all regions remained unchanged (10.4 +/- 4.2 mV prerevascularization vs. 10.2 +/- 4.4 mV postrevascularization), whereas mean local shortening (LS) of all regions increased from 6.0% +/- 5.8% to 9.7% +/- 5.3% (P < 0.001). The percentage of electromechanical match regions (LS < 6% and UP < 9 mV) remained unchanged after revascularization (15% vs. 10%; NS), whereas the percentage of mismatch regions (LS < 6% and UP > 9 mV) declined from 38% to 10% (P < 0.0001). We conclude that electromechanical mapping allows the sensitive detection of improved mechanical function after successful revascularization. Electrical activity remains unchanged 6 months after revascularization and the number of regions with an electromechanical mismatch decrease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koch et al. (2001) conducted an observational in prior myocardial infarction (n=15). percutaneous coronary revascularization vs. prerevascularization baseline was evaluated on mean local shortening (LS) of all regions (p=< 0.001). Percutaneous coronary revascularization significantly increased mean local shortening from 6.0% to 9.7% (P<0.001) and decreased electromechanical mismatch regions from 38% to 10% (P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: