Key result
Anistreplase yields similar reperfusion and long-term survival compared to streptokinase.
Why the study?
Does anistreplase improve clinical effectiveness and survival compared to streptokinase in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
RCT (n=110)
randomized
Does anistreplase improve clinical effectiveness and survival compared to streptokinase in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Absolute Event Rate: 65% vs 71%
p-value: p=NS
Anistreplase and streptokinase are equally effective thrombolytic agents for acute myocardial infarction, but anistreplase offers the practical advantage of bolus administration.
Equivalent reperfusion and survival with anistreplase versus streptokinase in AMI; supports bolus dosing as a convenient alternative without outcome compromise.
Streptokinase is well established as an effective thrombolytic. Anistreplase, a new thrombolytic drug, is a complex of streptokinase and acylated human plasminogen that can be administered by intravenous bolus and activates plasminogen at the clot site. Although both streptokinase and anistreplase are effected in treating myocardial infarction (MI), they have different pharmacologic properties. This study was designed to identify short- and long-term differences in their clinical effectiveness, safety in use, and survival rates in patients with acute MI. One hundred ten successive patients under seventy years of age admitted within three hours after onset of sustained chest pain suggestive of acute MI were randomized to receive either 30 units of anistreplase intravenously over five minutes or intravenous injection of 750,000 units of streptokinase over thirty to sixty minutes. Reperfusion was achieved in 34 of the 52 (65%) patients treated with anistreplase and in 41 of the 58 (71%) patients treated with streptokinase (p = NS). The two drugs were equally effective in preserving left ventricular ejection fraction, which was found to be significantly better in patients with anterior wall MI who had achieved reperfusion than it was in those who did not (p less than 0.02). One-month, twelve-month, and thirty-six-month survival rates were high (96% to 88%) with no significant difference between the two treatment groups. The authors conclude that the two drugs are equally effective thrombolytic agents but that anistreplase has the advantage that it can be administered as a bolus injection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silber et al. (1992) conducted an RCT in Acute Myocardial Infarction (n=110). Anistreplase vs. Streptokinase (750,000 units intravenously over 30 to 60 minutes) was evaluated on Reperfusion (p=NS). Anistreplase achieved reperfusion in 65% of patients compared to 71% with streptokinase (p = NS), with both drugs showing similarly high survival rates up to 36 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: