Key result
Evening chronotype linked to ~336% higher odds of unhealthy behavior trajectories versus morning chronotype.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to describe the trajectories of health-risk behaviors among college students and explore how chronotype and sleep duration relate to these trajectories.
Do chronotype and sleep duration affect the trajectories of health-risk behaviors in college students?
Cohort (n=1,042)
Do chronotype and sleep duration affect the trajectories of health-risk behaviors in college students?
Odds Ratio: 4.36 (95% CI 1.72–11.08)
p-value: p=<0.05
Evening chronotypes and aberrant sleep durations are associated with unhealthier trajectories of health-risk behaviors among college students, highlighting the need for targeted sleep interventions.
Evening chronotype was associated with unhealthy behavior trajectories in students; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective trials before guiding interventions.
Purpose: To describe the trajectories of health-risk behaviors (HRBs) among college students through four consecutive surveys and explore the relationship between chronotype, sleep duration and different trajectories of HRBs.Methods: We used a data sample of 1,042 college students from the College Student Behavior and Health Cohort Study. Students reported sleep parameters, including chronotype (Morning and Evening Questionnaire-5, MEQ-5) and sleep duration. The behavior scale was used to evaluate four HRBs (smoking, alcohol use, low physical activity, smartphone addiction). The latent class growth analysis (LCGA) was used to estimate the trajectory of self-reported HRBs. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to study whether sleep parameters (chronotype and sleep duration) correlated with HRBs' trajectories.Results: Four unique trajectories of behaviors were identified: unhealthy group (7.4%), increasing group (21.3%), decreasing group (10.3%) and healthy group (61.0%). Compared with the normal sleep, results from logistic regression analyses indicated that long sleep (>9 h) was associated with the decreasing group and the unhealthy group(p<0.05), while short sleep (<7 h) was associated with the increasing group and the unhealthy group(p<0.05). Compared with the M-types, the E-types were positively correlated with the unhealthy group, the increasing group, and the decreasing group (p<0.05).Conclusion: E-types and aberrant sleep duration (short and long sleep duration) were significantly associated with the trajectory of HRBs. Findings underscore the need for targeted screening and prevention of modifiable sleep behaviors with the aim of improving HRBs in college students.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Health-risk behaviors (n=1,042). Evening chronotype (E-types) vs. Morning chronotype (M-types) was evaluated on Unhealthy trajectory of health-risk behaviors (OR 4.36, 95% CI 1.72-11.08, p=<0.05). Evening chronotype was significantly associated with an unhealthy trajectory of health-risk behaviors among college students (OR 4.36) compared to morning chronotype.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: