Key result
Secondary stress cardiomyopathy in critical illness presents atypically and carries a worse prognosis than primary cases.
Secondary stress cardiomyopathy in critically ill patients presents atypically, carries a worse prognosis than primary SC, and requires specific diagnostic approaches.
Recognition of secondary SC in critical illness may warrant vigilance; leaves open dedicated criteria and outcome studies.
Stress cardiomyopathy (SC) typically presents as potential acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in previously healthy people. While there may be physical or mental stressors, the initial symptom is usually chest pain. This form conforms to the published Mayo diagnostic criteria, is well reported and as the presentation is initially cardiac, is considered primary SC. Increasingly we see SC develop several days into the hospitalization secondary to medical or surgical critical illness. This condition is more complex, presents atypically, is not easy to recognize and carries a much worse prognosis. Label of Secondary SC is appropriate as it manifests in sicker hospitalized patients with numerous comorbidities. We review the limited but provocative literature pertinent to SC in the critically ill and describe important clues to identify global, subclinical and probable forms of SC. We illustrate the several unique clinical features, demographic differences and propose a diagnostic algorithm to optimize cardiac care in the critically ill.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anand Chockalingam (2017) conducted a review in Stress cardiomyopathy. Secondary stress cardiomyopathy vs. Primary stress cardiomyopathy was evaluated. Secondary stress cardiomyopathy in critically ill patients presents atypically, is difficult to recognize, and carries a much worse prognosis than primary stress cardiomyopathy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: