Key result
Higher CAVI is linked to ~130% higher odds of significant plaque burden and extent.
Why the study?
Does the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) predict the severity, extent, and burden of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis evaluated by CCTA?
Cross-Sectional (n=95)
Does the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) predict the severity, extent, and burden of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis evaluated by CCTA?
Odds Ratio: 2.3 (95% CI 1.1–7.8)
p-value: p=0.03
CAVI is significantly associated with subclinical coronary atherosclerosis burden and extent on CCTA, suggesting its utility as a noninvasive marker for coronary plaque burden rather than severe stenosis.
May support CAVI for noninvasive plaque burden assessment on CCTA; leaves open prospective validation for risk prediction.
BACKGROUND: The cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) is a new noninvasive index to evaluate arterial stiffness. We investigated whether CAVI can predict severity, extent, and burden of coronary artery disease by comparing results with cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA). HYPOTHESIS: CAVI may predict the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 95 patients (66% male; mean age, 50 ± 16 years) who underwent both CCTA and CAVI consecutively. We evaluated if CAVI correlated with (1) severe stenosis (≥50%); (2) plaque extent, determined by a segment-involvement score (SIS), defined by the total number of coronary artery segments containing any plaque; and (3) plaque burden, determined by a segment-stenosis score (SSS), defined by the extent of obstruction of coronary luminal diameter in individual coronary artery segments. RESULTS: = 0.36, P < 0.0001 for SSS). Multivariable logistic analysis demonstrated that CAVI is significantly associated with SSS >5 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-7.8, P = 0.03) and SIS >5 (OR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.1-5.8, P = 0.02), but not severe stenosis (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 0.9-4.3, P = 0.13), after adjusting for age, sex, chest pain, hypertension, dyslipidemia, family history, diabetes, and current smoking. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that CAVI had a significant relationship with subclinical coronary atherosclerosis evaluated by CCTA, especially in relation to plaque burden and plaque extent, but not severe stenosis. Thus, CAVI may reflect coronary atherosclerosis burden more than severity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsumoto et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Subclinical atherosclerosis (n=95). Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) was evaluated on Plaque burden determined by a segment-stenosis score (SSS) >5 (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-7.8, p=0.03). The cardio-ankle vascular index was significantly associated with plaque burden (SSS >5; OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-7.8, P=0.03) and plaque extent (SIS >5; OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-5.8, P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: