Key result
MMDx shows ~84% agreement with EMBx for rejection but classifies more discordant cases as rejection.
Why the study?
Little is known about the performance of the Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System (MMDx) relative to other validated modalities in a real-world heart transplant population.
Does the Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System (MMDx) perform in agreement with endomyocardial biopsy and dd-cfDNA for detecting allograft rejection in adult heart transplant patients?
Observational (n=135)
Does the Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System (MMDx) perform in agreement with endomyocardial biopsy and dd-cfDNA for detecting allograft rejection in adult heart transplant patients?
Effect estimate: Cohen's kappa 0.48
p-value: p=< .001
In a real-world heart transplant cohort, MMDx showed moderate to slight agreement with traditional biopsy and dd-cfDNA, but systematically classified more cases as rejection, which has implications for surveillance and workup.
MMDx shows moderate agreement with EMBx but detects more rejection; leaves open its added value in real-world surveillance pending prospective studies.
The Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System (MMDx) analyzes RNA transcripts of transplanted heart tissue to differentiate among T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), injury, and healthy tissue. However, little is known about its performance in relation to other modalities in a real-world heart transplant population. We evaluated whether MMDx performs in agreement with other validated modalities. Two hundred and twenty-eight corresponding endomyocardial biopsies (EMBx) and MMDx specimens from 135 adult heart transplant patients were retrospectively reviewed with correlating donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA). Rejection was classified on EMBx in 29 specimens (TCMR ≥ 2R and/or AMR ≥ 1), on MMDx in 56 specimens, and in 74 values with dd-cfDNA ≥0.20%. Despite moderate agreement between EMBx and MMDx (84% agreement, Cohen's kappa, 0.48, p < .001), systematic differences were observed (McNemar's test, p < .001) where MMDx classified 32 of 37 discordant cases as rejection. MMDx and dd-cfDNA demonstrated slight agreement (72% agreement, Cohen's kappa, 0.39, p < .001); however, systematic differences were also apparent where MMDx classified 12 of 50 discordant specimens as rejection when dd-cfDNA was <0.20% (McNemar's test, p < .001). Our findings provide insight on the performance of MMDx relative to other modalities in a heart transplant cohort and have implications on the surveillance and workup of allograft rejection in heart transplantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alam et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Heart transplant rejection (n=135). Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System (MMDx) vs. Endomyocardial biopsies (EMBx) and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) was evaluated on Agreement between MMDx and EMBx for rejection classification (Cohen's kappa 0.48, p=< .001). The Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System showed moderate agreement with endomyocardial biopsy for rejection (84% agreement, kappa 0.48, p<0.001) but classified more discordant cases as rejection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: