Key result
Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery for infective endocarditis is linked to ~10% 30-day mortality.
Why the study?
Does minimally invasive mitral valve surgery provide safe and durable outcomes in patients with isolated mitral valve infective endocarditis?
Cohort (n=92)
No
Does minimally invasive mitral valve surgery provide safe and durable outcomes in patients with isolated mitral valve infective endocarditis?
Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is a feasible and safe approach for selected patients with isolated mitral valve infective endocarditis, demonstrating acceptable 1-year survival and low rates of reoperation.
May support minimally invasive mitral surgery in selected IE cases; hypothesis-generating pending randomized comparison to sternotomy.
BACKGROUND: The feasibility of minimally invasive mitral valve (MV) surgery in infective endocarditis (IE) has not been reported in detail. We assessed the safety, efficacy, and durability of the minimally invasive approach through a right anterolateral minithoracotomy for surgical treatment of MV IE. METHODS: A review of the Leipzig Heart Center database revealed 92 eligible patients operated on between 2002 and 2013. All patients had undergone minimally invasive surgery for IE. The indication for surgery was isolated IE of the MV in all patients. Baseline and intraoperative data, as well as clinical outcomes and short-term follow-up were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 60.9 ± 15.3 years, the logistic EuroSCORE II was 19.6 ± 19.1%, and 64.1% (59) were male. MV repair was feasible in 23.9% (22/92) of patients. Repair techniques included annuloplasty ring implantation, anterior mitral leaflet resection, posterior mitral leaflet resection, and implantation of neochordae. MV replacement was performed in 69 patients (75%), a mitral annulus patch in 1 patient, and concomitant tricuspid valve surgery for tricuspid regurgitation in 5 patients. Bacteriological analysis showed staphylococcus infection in 45.5%, streptococcus in 36.4%, enterococcus in 13.6%, and others in 4.5%. The 30-day-mortality rate was 9.8% (9 patients). The 1-year follow-up showed a 1-year survival rate of 77.7 ± 4.4% and freedom from reoperation within 1 year due to reendocarditis of 93.3 ± 2.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The minimally invasive approach is suitable for the treatment of IE of the MV. It is a good technique in IE in selected patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seeburger et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Mitral valve infective endocarditis (n=92). Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery was evaluated on 30-day mortality. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery for infective endocarditis was associated with a 30-day mortality rate of 9.8% and a 1-year survival rate of 77.7%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: