Why the study?
Does minimal access mitral valve surgery provide good early and long-term outcomes in patients with mitral valve infective endocarditis?
Does minimal access mitral valve surgery provide good early and long-term outcomes in patients with mitral valve infective endocarditis?
Minimal access mitral valve surgery for infective endocarditis is feasible and yields good 1- and 5-year survival and freedom from recurrence.
Supports the feasibility of minimal access surgery for mitral valve endocarditis; leaves open whether this.
OBJECTIVES: Minimal access mitral valve surgery (MVS) has already proved to be feasible and effective with low perioperative mortality and excellent long-term outcomes. However, experience in more complex valve diseases such as infective endocarditis (IE) still remains limited. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate early and long-term results of minimal access MVS for IE. METHODS: Data were entered into a dedicated database. Analysis was performed retrospectively for the 8-year period between January 2007 and April 2015. RESULTS: During the study period, 35 consecutive patients underwent minimal access MVS for IE at our department. Twenty-four had diagnosis of native MV endocarditis (68.6%) and 11 of mitral prosthesis endocarditis (31.4%).Thirty patients underwent early MVS (85.7%), and 5 patients were operated after the completion of antibiotic treatment (14.3%). Seven patients underwent MV repair (20%), 17 patients underwent MV replacement (48.6%), and 11 patients underwent mitral prosthesis replacement (31.4%). Thirty-day mortality was 11.4% (4 patients). No neurological or vascular complications were reported. One patient underwent reoperation for prosthesis IE relapse after 37 days. Overall actuarial survival rate at 1 and 5 years was 83%; freedom from MV reoperation and/or recurrence of IE at 1 and 5 years was 97%. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive MVS for IE is feasible and associated with good early and long-term results. Preoperative accurate patient selection and transoesophageal echocardiography evaluation is mandatory for surgical planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barbero et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: