Key result
LEIA-HF trial evaluates repetitive levosimendan versus placebo for major events in advanced HFrEF.
Why the study?
Outpatients with chronically advanced HFrEF frequently require hospitalizations and lack additional therapeutic options, prompting evaluation of repeated levosimendan infusions.
Does repetitive use of levosimendan reduce death or unplanned heart failure hospitalization in ambulatory patients with chronic, advanced HFrEF?
RCT (n=350)
Double-blind
1:1
Yes
Does repetitive use of levosimendan reduce death or unplanned heart failure hospitalization in ambulatory patients with chronic, advanced HFrEF?
The LEIA-HF trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of repetitive levosimendan infusions in ambulatory patients with advanced HFrEF.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fills evidence gap for repetitive inotropes in advanced ambulatory HFrEF; delivers first Phase 4 RCT on death or HF hospitalization.
PURPOSE: Clinical practice forces the necessity to conduct a clinical trial concerning the group of outpatients with chronically advanced heart failure in III or IV NYHA functional class, frequently requiring hospitalizations due to HF exacerbation, and often left without any additional therapeutic option. The current trial aims to determine the efficacy and safety of repeated levosimendan infusions in the group of severe outpatients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). MATERIAL AND METHODS: LEIA-HF (LEvosimendan In Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients) is a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 4 clinical trial to determine whether the repetitive use of levosimendan reduces the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in ambulatory patients with chronic, advanced HFrEF. A total of 350 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either levosimendan or placebo, which will be administered as continuous 24 h infusions, every 4 weeks for 48 weeks (12 infusions in total - phase I), and followed by double-blind 6 visits, every 4 weeks (phase II of the trial including the option of restarting levosimendan or placebo, based on the fulfillment of additional criteria). The primary endpoint for efficacy assessment will be death from any cause or unplanned hospitalization for HF assessed together, whichever occurs first, in a 12-month follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: A well-designed study with a consistent protocol, including the drug side effects, comprehensive clinical assessment, appropriate definition of endpoints, and monitoring therapy, may provide a complete overview of the effectiveness and safety profile of the repetitive levosimendan administration in ambulatory severe HFrEF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tycińska et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Chronic, advanced HFrEF (n=350). Levosimendan vs. Placebo was evaluated on Death from any cause or unplanned hospitalization for HF assessed together, whichever occurs first.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: