Key result
LeoDOR trial protocol outlines design evaluating intermittent IV levosimendan for advanced heart failure.
Why the study?
Hospitalization for acute heart failure is associated with high morbidity, mortality, and rehospitalization rates during the vulnerable post-discharge period, with limited effective therapeutic innovations available.
Does intermittent levosimendan therapy improve a global rank endpoint of mortality, heart failure events, and NT-proBNP levels in patients with advanced chronic heart failure following hospitalization for acute heart failure?
RCT (n=264)
Double-blind
2:1
Yes
Does intermittent levosimendan therapy improve a global rank endpoint of mortality, heart failure events, and NT-proBNP levels in patients with advanced chronic heart failure following hospitalization for acute heart failure?
The LeoDOR trial will evaluate whether intermittent levosimendan therapy during the vulnerable post-discharge phase improves outcomes in advanced heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LeoDOR RCT protocol tests intermittent levosimendan post-discharge in advanced HF; leaves open its effect on global rank endpoint.
Hospitalization for acute heart failure (HF) is associated with a substantial morbidity burden and with associated healthcare costs and an increased mortality risk. However, few if any major medical innovations have been witnessed in this area in recent times. Levosimendan is a first-in-class calcium sensitizer and potassium channel opener indicated for the management of acute HF. Experience in several clinical studies has indicated that administration of intravenous levosimendan in intermittent cycles may reduce hospitalization and mortality rates in patients with advanced HF; however, none of those trials were designed or powered to give conclusive insights into that possibility. This paper describes the rationale and protocol of LeoDOR (levosimendan infusions for patients with advanced chronic heart failure), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international, multicentre trial that will explore the efficacy and safety of intermittent levosimendan therapy, in addition to optimized standard therapy, in patients following hospitalization for acute HF. Salient features of LeoDOR include the use of two treatment regimens, in order to evaluate the effects of different schedules and doses of levosimendan during a 12 week treatment phase, and the use of a global rank primary endpoint, in which all patients are ranked across three hierarchical groups ranging from time to death or urgent heart transplantation or implantation of a ventricular assist device to time to rehospitalization and, lastly, time-averaged proportional change in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. Secondary endpoints include changes in HF symptoms and functional status at 14 weeks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pölzl et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Advanced Chronic Heart Failure (n=264). Levosimendan vs. Matching placebo was evaluated on Global rank endpoint: time to death or urgent heart transplantation or VAD implantation, time to non-fatal HF requiring IV vasoactive therapy, and time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP at 14 weeks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: