Key result
Intermittent levosimendan in advanced HF is linked to ~31% fewer major events versus the prior year.
Why the study?
Patients with advanced heart failure ineligible for advanced therapies face poor prognosis, prompting investigation into real-life patterns of use, safety, and response predictors for intermittent levosimendan infusions.
Does intermittent levosimendan reduce heart failure events in patients with advanced heart failure who are not candidates for advanced therapies?
Observational (n=403)
Yes
Does intermittent levosimendan reduce heart failure events in patients with advanced heart failure who are not candidates for advanced therapies?
Absolute Event Rate: 56.3% vs 81.4%
p-value: p=< 0.0001
In a real-world registry of advanced heart failure patients ineligible for advanced therapies, intermittent levosimendan significantly reduced heart failure events compared to the prior year.
May reduce events in advanced HF ineligible for advanced therapies; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
AIM: Patients with advanced heart failure (AHF) who are not candidates to advanced therapies have poor prognosis. Some trials have shown that intermittent levosimendan can reduce HF hospitalizations in AHF in the short term. In this real-life registry, we describe the patterns of use, safety and factors related to the response to intermittent levosimendan infusions in AHF patients not candidates to advanced therapies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Multicentre retrospective study of patients diagnosed with advanced heart failure, not HT or LVAD candidates. Patients needed to be on the optimal medical therapy according to their treating physician. Patients with de novo heart failure or who underwent any procedure that could improve prognosis were not included in the registry. Four hundred three patients were included; 77.9% needed at least one admission the year before levosimendan was first administered because of heart failure. Death rate at 1 year was 26.8% and median survival was 24.7 [95% CI: 20.4-26.9] months, and 43.7% of patients fulfilled the criteria for being considered a responder lo levosimendan (no death, heart failure admission or unplanned HF visit at 1 year after first levosimendan administration). Compared with the year before there was a significant reduction in HF admissions (38.7% vs. 77.9%; P < 0.0001), unplanned HF visits (22.7% vs. 43.7%; P < 0.0001) or the combined event including deaths (56.3% vs. 81.4%; P < 0.0001) during the year after. We created a score that helps predicting the responder status at 1 year after levosimendan, resulting in a score summatory of five variables: TEER (+2), treatment with beta-blockers (+1.5), Haemoglobin >12 g/dL (+1.5), amiodarone use (-1.5) HF visit 1 year before levosimendan (-1.5) and heart rate >70 b.p.m. (-2). Patients with a score less than -1 had a very low probability of response (21.5% free of death or HF event at 1 year) meanwhile those with a score over 1.5 had the better chance of response (68.4% free of death or HF event at 1 year). LEVO-D score performed well in the ROC analysis. CONCLUSION: In this large real-life series of AHF patients treated with levosimendan as destination therapy, we show a significant decrease of heart failure events during the year after the first administration. The simple LEVO-D Score could be of help when deciding about futile therapy in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dobarro et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Advanced heart failure (n=403). Intermittent levosimendan vs. Year prior to levosimendan administration was evaluated on Combined event including deaths, HF admissions, or unplanned HF visits (p=< 0.0001). Intermittent levosimendan in advanced heart failure significantly reduced the combined event of death or HF events compared to the prior year (56.3% vs 81.4%; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: