Key result
Survey reveals 71% of CR providers support integrating obesity management despite training and time constraints.
Why the study?
Despite its relevance to cardiovascular health, obesity is rarely targeted during cardiac rehabilitation, prompting an evaluation of whether weight management should be offered as a standard component.
Should obesity management be offered as a standard component of cardiac rehabilitation for patients with obesity?
Should obesity management be offered as a standard component of cardiac rehabilitation for patients with obesity?
While most Canadian cardiac rehabilitation providers support integrating obesity management into their programs, significant barriers such as training gaps and weight bias must be addressed to optimize treatment outcomes.
High provider support for obesity management in cardiac rehab is tempered by barriers; leaves open optimal implementation and outcome effects.
Despite its relevance to cardiovascular health, obesity is rarely targeted during cardiac rehabilitation (CR). The objective of this paper was to review evidence regarding whether measures to address excess body fat should be offered as a standard component of CR for patients with obesity. We organize the paper around three themes: 1) outcomes of obesity management, 2) the complexity of obesity management, and 3) patient attitudes, experiences, and preferences. Our discussion of each theme was informed by a narrative literature review and a survey of Canadian CR healthcare providers (n=80). We consider literature regarding available approaches to obesity management including behavioural weight loss, pharmacological, and surgical treatments. We go on to assess concerns relating to the complexity of obesity intervention, and the importance of CR patients' lived experiences and goals. Finally, we summarize obesity management considerations in the context of the goals and interventions of CR. Although most (71%) CR providers support integrating obesity management into CR, there are concerns about training, weight bias, and unrealistic expectations for weight loss within time-limited programs. Efforts to incorporate obesity management into CR must address these barriers while considering evidence-based strategies to optimize treatment outcomes (e.g., adjunctive pharmacotherapy; long-term follow-up). Whether CR should offer obesity management depends on provider competency and program resources. More research is needed to clarify patient preferences and to establish the feasibility, long-term efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of obesity management approaches in CR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rouleau et al. (2025) conducted a review in Obesity in Cardiac Rehabilitation (n=80). Obesity management in cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated on Provider support for integrating obesity management into CR. A survey of 80 Canadian cardiac rehabilitation providers found that 71% support integrating obesity management into programs, despite concerns about training, weight bias, and time constraints.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: