Key result
LVAS and prosthetic mitral valves produce longer micro-embolic signals than NVAF and carotid stenosis.
Why the study?
Can transcranial Doppler wave analysis differentiate micro-embolic signals from various embolic sources?
Observational (n=10)
Can transcranial Doppler wave analysis differentiate micro-embolic signals from various embolic sources?
TCD wave analysis can differentiate micro-embolic signals by source, with signal duration reflecting embolus size and components, potentially serving as a parameter for stroke risk.
Background: The embolic signal obtained by TCD varies in sound, pitch and duration according to the size of the embolus and the materials of which it is composed. We tried to differentiate the micro-embolic signal from various embolic sources by wave analysis and also to clarify its clinical significance.Methods and Results: We recorded micro-embolic signals using TCD in 10 patients with various embolic conditions; 3 patients on a left ventricular assistance system (LVAS), 3 patients after replacement of the mitral valve with a prosthesis (MV), 2 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), and 2 patients with high-grade carotid stenosis (CS) . Acoustic power (AP), frequency, duration and background blood velocity (Vbg) were measured by a microcomputer system. The average duration of the embolic signal was longer in patients with LVAS and MV than in those with NVAF and CS. All patients who showed a correlation between Vbg and all parameters (AP, frequency, duration) were asymptomatic.Conclusion: The duration of micro-embolic signals, which reflects the size and components of the embolus, differs largely according to the embolic source. The correlation of background velocity with three parameters of micro-embolic signals (AP, duration, frequency) which appear to reflect the homogeneity of micro-emboli, may be a parameter indicating stroke risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagatsuka et al. (1997) conducted an observational in Embolic conditions (LVAS, MV prosthesis, NVAF, carotid stenosis) (n=10). Embolic source (LVAS, MV, NVAF, CS) vs. Comparison between different embolic sources was evaluated on Duration, acoustic power, and frequency of micro-embolic signals. The duration of micro-embolic signals was longer in patients with left ventricular assistance systems and prosthetic mitral valves compared to those with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and carotid stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: