Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: The prognostic impact of baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is debated. To evaluate this issue, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the role of CRP value in predicting early-stage NSCLC survival. METHODS: Ten articles on early-stage NSCLC were eligible and included in our study. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis and assessed heterogeneity and publication bias. We pooled hazard ratio (HR) estimates and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on mortality for the comparison between the study-specific highest category of CRP level versus the lowest one. RESULTS: In overall analysis, elevated pretreatment CRP values were significantly associated with poor overall survival (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.30-1.97, p<0.001, I2 = 71.9%). Similar results were observed across considered strata. However, higher mortality risk was reported in studies in which CRP was combined with other factors (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.58-2.45) and in those using a cutoff value of 3 mg/L (HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.52-2.35). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our analysis, baseline high CRP level is significantly associated with poor prognosis in early-stage NSCLC. Further prospective controlled studies are needed to confirm these data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leuzzi et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: