Key result
The provided abstract contains only data availability statements and no quantitative results regarding the disparities in diabetes burden in China and globally.
Systematic Review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Abstract lacks quantitative results on diabetes disparities; leaves open empirical synthesis of China-global burden data.
The authors declare no competing interests. The peer review history for this article is available at https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer-review/10.1111/dom.16482. The data that support the findings of this study are available in the Global Health Data Exchange at http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-2019/datainput-sources. Data S1. Supporting Information. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yin et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Diabetes. The provided abstract contains only data availability statements and no quantitative results regarding the disparities in diabetes burden in China and globally.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: