Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates context-dependent disruption of visual self-identification under simulated crime scenarios, suggesting distinct cognitive modulation of identity cues.
This study examined how crime-related contextual information modulates self-identification through auditory and visual identity cues. Using a simulated-crime paradigm, two experiments tested recognition of self-voice and self-face under three contextual conditions: self-relevant crime information, self-irrelevant crime information, and self-relevant non-crime information. Experiment 1 examined self-voice recognition. Participants responded faster under self-relevant contexts than under self-irrelevant crime information, suggesting that contextual self-relevance may facilitate auditory identity processing by increasing semantic engagement. Experiment 2 examined self-face recognition. Participants showed a self-face advantage under self-irrelevant crime and self-relevant non-crime contexts, but this advantage disappeared when crime-related information was directly linked to the self. Supplementary Ex-Gaussian analyses indicated that this modulation was mainly reflected in the μ parameter rather than in σ or τ, suggesting a shift in the central tendency of self-face responses rather than increased response variability or extreme slowing. Exploratory HDDM analyses further suggested that contextual effects were associated with changes in evidence accumulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: