Network analysis reveals differentiated engagement patterns of MIKTA middle powers across international organizations, indicating strategic diversification beyond core global governance institutions.
This article uses Social Network Analysis to explain the relationships between middle power MIKTA states and International Organizations. It investigates how social network dynamics shape these countries’ patterns of interaction with seven IOs and questions how they may utilize their networked connections to generate influence within global governance. To do so, the study maps the positional configurations of MIKTA members across organizational networks via a four-criteria framework: institutional and legal depth; political-diplomatic intensity; bureaucratic and operational integration; and project and funding depth. The findings demonstrate that member states are situated in differentiated positions within the multilayered networks of IOs, converging within institutions located at the core of the global system while developing more selective and diversified engagement strategies across regional and alternative platforms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DAL et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: