Key result
RV-FWLS correlates best with CMR-derived RVEF among echo metrics with r of ~0.79.
Why the study?
CMR is the reference standard for RV quantification in pulmonary hypertension but has limited availability, and the extent to which accessible echocardiographic indices correspond with CMR-derived RVEF remains incompletely defined.
Do echocardiographic measures of right ventricular function (RV-FAC, RV-FWLS, RV-GLS) correlate with CMR-derived RVEF in patients with pulmonary hypertension?
Meta-Analysis (n=402)
Yes
Do echocardiographic measures of right ventricular function (RV-FAC, RV-FWLS, RV-GLS) correlate with CMR-derived RVEF in patients with pulmonary hypertension?
Effect estimate: r = 0.79 (95% CI 0.73-0.83)
Echocardiographic parameters, particularly RV-FWLS, correlate strongly with CMR-derived RVEF in patients with pulmonary hypertension, supporting their use as practical non-invasive adjuncts for right ventricular assessment when CMR is unavailable.
Supports RV-FWLS as practical echocardiographic adjunct for RV assessment when CMR unavailable in pulmonary hypertension; confirms strongest pooled correlation among parameters.
Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with increased pulmonary arterial pressure and impairment of right ventricular (RV) function. Reliable characterization of RV performance is important for prognosis, risk assessment, and therapeutic planning. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is considered the reference technique for quantifying RV volumes and function, but its expense and limited availability can restrict routine implementation. Echocardiography is more widely accessible; however, the extent to which individual echocardiographic indices correspond with CMR-derived RV ejection fraction (RVEF) remains incompletely defined. Objective: Our objective was to determine the correlation of RV fractional area change (RV-FAC), RV free-wall longitudinal strain (RV-FWLS), and RV global longitudinal strain (RV-GLS) with CMR-derived RVEF in individuals with PH. Methods: PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched, yielding 404 records; six studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Studies were eligible when they enrolled patients with PH and provided extractable correlations between at least one prespecified echocardiographic measure and CMR-derived RVEF. Correlation coefficients were converted with Fisher’s z transformation, combined using common-effect and random-effects approaches, and then transformed back to correlation coefficients. Pooled mean RV-FAC was evaluated as a separate outcome. Between-study heterogeneity was quantified with I2 and τ2, with random-effects estimates emphasized for interpretation. Results: Each evaluated echocardiographic measure was positively correlated with CMR-derived RVEF. RV-FWLS had the largest pooled correlation and the greatest consistency (r = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.73–0.83; I2 = 0.0%). The pooled correlation for RV-GLS was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.60–0.85; I2 = 80.3%), while that for RV-FAC was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.61–0.80; I2 = 61.8%). The random-effects pooled mean RV-FAC was 31.10% (95% CI: 26.77–35.43), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 90.9%). Conclusions: RV-FWLS showed the highest numerical and most consistent association with CMR-derived RVEF, suggesting that it may serve as a useful non-invasive adjunct for RV assessment in PH, especially where CMR is not readily available. Larger studies using harmonized acquisition and analysis methods are required for confirmation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Pulmonary hypertension (n=402). Echocardiographic right ventricular functional parameters (RV-FWLS, RV-GLS, RV-FAC) vs. CMR-derived RVEF was evaluated on Correlation with CMR-derived RVEF (r = 0.79, 95% CI 0.73-0.83). RV-FWLS showed the highest numerical and most consistent association with CMR-derived RVEF (r = 0.79, 95% CI 0.73-0.83).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: