Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study observes high adherence and persistence to tepotinib in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, indicating dose reductions support treatment continuity.
AIM: This study evaluated the real-world persistence, adherence, treatment discontinuation, and dose reduction of tepotinib in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: This exploratory, retrospective study used McKesson's Biologics Specialty Pharmacy shipment data (10 February 2021-07 April 2025). Adults ≥50 years with NSCLC receiving tepotinib were included. Persistence was assessed as days supplied and covered; adherence as proportion of days covered (PDC), unadjusted and adjusted for gaps >42 days. Dose modifications, discontinuations, and time to last discontinuation were evaluated. Outcomes were assessed in the full cohort and a dose reduction subgroup. RESULTS: Full cohort included 436 patients (median age: 71 years; follow-up: 6.4 months). Median (range) days supplied and covered were 120 (15-1,950) days and 119 (15-1,388) days, respectively. Mean unadjusted PDC was 72.9% and adjusted PDC was 94.9%. Dose reduction was observed in 64 (14.7%) patients. Among these, median days supplied and covered since dose reduction were 120 (30-870) days and 120 (30-857) days, respectively. Mean unadjusted PDC was 78.1% and adjusted PDC was 92.7%. CONCLUSION: Tepotinib therapy showed consistent real-world persistence and adherence among patients with metastatic NSCLC. Dose reductions supported continuity of tepotinib therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: