Key result
Vascular brachytherapy for DES restenosis yields a ~26% one-year MACE rate.
Why the study?
Does conventional percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunct vascular brachytherapy improve outcomes in patients with drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis?
Cohort (n=99)
Does conventional percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunct vascular brachytherapy improve outcomes in patients with drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis?
Vascular brachytherapy is a safe and effective treatment for drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis, yielding an 11% target lesion revascularization rate at 1 year.
May support vascular brachytherapy in drug-eluting stent restenosis; hypothesis-generating without randomized controls.
BACKGROUND: The rate of drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR) exceeds 10% in complex subsets of patients and lesions. The optimal management of DES ISR remains undetermined. Vascular brachytherapy (VBT) is proven to be effective for the treatment of bare metal stent ISR but its outcome for DES ISR has not been established. METHODS: Ninety-nine consecutive patients who presented with ISR following DES implantation in 122 lesions were subjected to conventional percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunct VBT using either beta radiation (Beta Rail in 74 patients [82.2%] and the Galileo system in 13 patients [14.4%]) or gamma radiation (Checkmate system in 3 patients [3.3%]). Patients were followed clinically for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: A high proportion of patients in this cohort presented with complex ISR; 31.1% had recurrences of ISR to the same site, 55% had diffuse or proliferate pattern of restenosis, and 23 lesions (18.9%) were located in a saphenous vein graft. Procedural success and uneventful in-hospital course were documented in all patients post VBT. At 12 months' follow-up, the target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate was 11% and the overall MACE rate was 26%. Patients with multiple episodes of ISR to the same site had a TLR of 16% and MACE rate of 35.5%. CONCLUSIONS: VBT for the treatment of DES ISR was found to be effective and safe and should be considered for the treatment of DES ISR, in particular in complex patients with multiple recurrences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bonello et al. (2008) conducted a cohort in Drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis (n=99). Vascular brachytherapy was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Vascular brachytherapy for drug-eluting stent restenosis resulted in a 1-year target lesion revascularization rate of 11% and an overall major adverse cardiac event rate of 26%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: