Key result
Intracoronary brachytherapy for recurrent DES restenosis shows no difference in procedural complications versus PCI alone.
Why the study?
Does intracoronary brachytherapy improve safety outcomes compared to percutaneous coronary intervention alone in patients with recurrent in-stent restenosis of drug-eluting stents?
Cohort (n=171)
No
Does intracoronary brachytherapy improve safety outcomes compared to percutaneous coronary intervention alone in patients with recurrent in-stent restenosis of drug-eluting stents?
Absolute Event Rate: 4.5% vs 0%
p-value: p=0.190
Intracoronary brachytherapy is a safe treatment option with low rates of procedural and postprocedural complications for patients with recurrent in-stent restenosis of drug-eluting stents.
PurposeGiven the limited salvage options for in-stent restenosis (ISR) of drug-eluting stents (DES), our high-volume cardiac catheterization laboratory has been performing intracoronary brachytherapy (ICBT) in patients with recurrent ISR of DES. This study analyzes their baseline characteristics and assesses the safety/toxicity of ICBT in this high-risk population.Methods and materialsA retrospective analysis of patients treated with ICBT between September 2012 and December 2014 was performed. Patients with ISR twice in a single location were eligible. Procedural complications included vessel dissection, perforation, tamponade, slow/absent blood flow, and vessel closure. Postprocedural events included myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, congestive heart failure, stroke, bleeding, thrombosis, embolism, dissection, dialysis, or death occurring within 72 hours. A control group of patients with 2 episodes of ISR at 1 location who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention without ICBT was identified. Unpaired t tests and χ2 tests were used to compare the groups.ResultsThere were 134 (78%) patients in the ICBT group with 141 treated lesions and 37 (22%) patients in the control group. There was a high prevalence of hyperlipidemia (>95%), hypertension (>95%), and diabetes (>50%) in both groups. The groups were well-balanced with respect to age, sex, and pre-existing medical conditions, with the exception of previous coronary artery bypass graft being more common the ICBT group. Procedural complication rates were low in the control and ICBT groups (0% vs 4.5%, P = .190). Postprocedural event rates were low (<5%) in both groups. Readmission rate at 30 days was 3.7% in the ICBT group and 5.4% in the control group (P = .649).ConclusionsThis is the largest recent known series looking at ICBT for recurrent ISR of DES. ICBT is a safe treatment option with similarly low rates (<5%) of procedural and postprocedural complications compared with percutaneous coronary intervention alone. This study establishes the safety of ICBT in a high-risk patient cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohri et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in In-stent restenosis of drug-eluting stents (n=171). Intracoronary brachytherapy vs. Percutaneous coronary intervention without intracoronary brachytherapy was evaluated on Procedural complication rates (p=0.190). Intracoronary brachytherapy for recurrent in-stent restenosis of drug-eluting stents demonstrated low procedural complication rates compared with percutaneous coronary intervention alone (4.5% vs 0%, P=0.190).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: