Key result
ART linked to ~9-fold higher postpartum hemorrhage risk and more cesareans in women with CVD.
Why the study?
Data regarding the safety profile and pregnancy outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies in women with cardiovascular disease remain limited as more women with CVD pursue these treatments.
Does assisted reproductive technology increase the risk of adverse maternal cardiac, obstetric, and fetal/neonatal outcomes in women with cardiovascular disease compared to spontaneous conception?
Case-Control (n=132)
No
Does assisted reproductive technology increase the risk of adverse maternal cardiac, obstetric, and fetal/neonatal outcomes in women with cardiovascular disease compared to spontaneous conception?
Absolute Event Rate: 68.2% vs 48.5%
p-value: p=0.031
Assisted reproductive technologies appear to have an acceptable safety profile in women with stable cardiovascular disease, though they are associated with increased rates of cesarean delivery and postpartum hemorrhage.
Supports ART consideration in stable CVD; leaves open need for prospective confirmation in larger cohorts.
BACKGROUND: Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) include medical interventions used to address infertility. As access to ART has expanded globally, more women with underlying cardiovascular disease (CVD) are pursuing these treatments. However, data regarding the safety profile and pregnancy outcomes of ART in women with CVD remain limited. In this study we evaluated whether ART is associated with adverse maternal cardiac, obstetric, and fetal and neonatal outcomes among women with CVD. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study of consecutive pregnancies achieved through ART, referred to a Canadian quaternary centre cardio-obstetrics program between 2021 and 2024. The ART cohort consisted of 66 pregnancies, which were matched 1:1 according to primary cardiac diagnosis with spontaneously conceived control pregnancies during the study period. RESULTS: The ART cohort included 34 women (51.5%) with acquired heart disease, 24 (36.4%) with congenital heart disease, 5 (7.6%) with acquired and congenital heart disease, and 3 (4.5%) with genetic syndromes with cardiac disease. Women in the ART cohort were older than control participants (mean age, 38.5 ± 5.6 vs 35.6 ± 4.7 years; P < 0.001). No cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome or ART-related complications were observed. Women who conceived using ART had higher rates of cesarean delivery (68.2% vs 48.5% P = 0.031) and postpartum hemorrhage (13.6% vs 1.5%; P = 0.021). All other maternal cardiac, obstetric, and fetal and neonatal outcomes were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: ART may be pursued with acceptable safety in women with low- to moderate-risk cardiac lesions or clinically stable CVD when managed in a specialized cardio-obstetric setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ardehali et al. (2026) conducted a case-control in Cardiovascular disease (n=132). Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) vs. Spontaneous conception was evaluated on Cesarean delivery (p=0.031). In women with cardiovascular disease, assisted reproductive technologies were associated with higher rates of cesarean delivery (68.2% vs 48.5%) and postpartum hemorrhage (13.6% vs 1.5%; P=0.021).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: