Key result
A P wave dispersion greater than 35 ms predicted inducible atrial tachyarrhythmias with 83% sensitivity and 89% specificity in patients with corrected Tetralogy of Fallot.
Why the study?
Does P wave dispersion predict inducible atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with corrected tetralogy of Fallot?
Case-Control (n=50)
No
Does P wave dispersion predict inducible atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with corrected tetralogy of Fallot?
Absolute Event Rate: 34.83% vs 24.1%
p-value: p=0.031
P wave dispersion >35 ms is a simple and accurate electrocardiographic marker for predicting atrial arrhythmias in patients after correction of tetralogy of Fallot.
May aid noninvasive arrhythmia risk stratification in repaired TOF; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to determine the potential role of P wave duration and P wave dispersion for risk assessment of atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with corrected tetralogy of Fallot (ToF). METHODS: The maximum P wave duration, minimum P wave duration, and the P wave dispersion from the 12-lead surface electrocardiogram of the patients and controls were measured. Electrophysiological study was performed only in the patient group. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 25 patients with corrected ToF with a mean age of 16.4 +/- 4.25 years and 25 age-matched healthy control subjects. Patients underwent repair at a mean age of 4.6 +/- 3.41 years (range: 1-19), and the mean duration of follow-up of 11.8 +/- 1.7 years (range: 9-15) after surgery. On electrophysiological study sinus node dysfunction was detected in 3 patients (12%), atrial tachyarrythmias-atrial flutter or fibrillation-in 5 patients (20%), both sinus node dysfunction and atrial flutter in 1 patient (4%), and AV conduction delay in 1 patient (4%). P wave dispersion is significantly higher in patients with atrial tachyarrhythmia inducible by electrophysiological study than in other patients (P < 0.05). A P wave dispersion value of >35 ms has a high predictive accuracy (sensitivity = 83% and specificity = 89%) for inducible atrial tachyarrhythmia in patients with corrected tetralogy of Fallot. CONCLUSION: P wave dispersion is an easily measured electrocardiographic marker with a good sensitivity and specificity for predicting atrial arrhythmias in patients after correction of ToF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hallıoğlu et al. (2004) conducted a case-control in Corrected Tetralogy of Fallot (n=50). P wave dispersion vs. Arrhythmia-free patients was evaluated on P wave dispersion in patients with inducible atrial tachyarrhythmia (p=0.031). A P wave dispersion greater than 35 ms predicted inducible atrial tachyarrhythmias with 83% sensitivity and 89% specificity in patients with corrected Tetralogy of Fallot.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: