Key result
Non-pneumatic digital tourniquets exert highly variable surface pressures up to 1560 mmHg in finger models.
Why the study?
Do different types of non-pneumatic digital tourniquets exert different surface pressures on finger models?
Do different types of non-pneumatic digital tourniquets exert different surface pressures on finger models?
p-value: p=<0.001
There is significant variability in the pressures exerted by different non-pneumatic digital tourniquets, highlighting the difficulty in regulating pressures and defining safe limits.
Pressure variability raises safety concerns for non-pneumatic digital tourniquets; leaves open standardization and human validation studies.
The UK National Patient Safety Agency issued a rapid response report in 2009 following reports of complications related to digital tourniquet use and inadvertent retention. In their guidance, they recommend the use of CE marked digital tourniquets and advise against the use of surgical gloves. There are a number of different commercially available non-pneumatic digital tourniquets, but little clear data relating to their comparable physical properties, clinical efficacy or safety. The aim of this study was to investigate the variability of pressures exerted by non-pneumatic digital tourniquets. A Tekscan FlexiForce(®) force sensor was used to measure applied force and to calculate the surface pressures under: the Toe-niquet™; T-Ring™ and surgical glove 'roll down' tourniquets in finger models. The lowest mean pressures were produced by the larger glove sizes (size 8) (25 mmHg), while the highest pressures were produced by the Toe-niquet (1560 mmHg). There was a significant overall difference in pressures exerted under tourniquets when comparing tourniquet type (p<0.001) and finger size (p<0.001) with these techniques. It is difficult to anticipate and regulate pressures generated by non-pneumatic tourniquets. Safe limits for application time and surface pressures are difficult to define. Further work is required to model the pressure effects of commercially available digital tourniquets and to identify which are most effective but safe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Middleton et al. (2013) studied this question. Non-pneumatic digital tourniquets vs. Different tourniquet types and finger sizes was evaluated on Surface pressures under tourniquets (p=<0.001). Surface pressures exerted by non-pneumatic digital tourniquets in finger models varied significantly by tourniquet type and finger size (p<0.001), ranging from 25 mmHg to 1560 mmHg.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: