Key result
Clinically significant extracranial bleeding was associated with an increased risk of incident ADL dependence in healthy older adults.
Why the study?
Compared to intracranial bleeding, the impact of clinically significant extracranial bleeding on long-term outcomes, including functional independence, has been poorly studied.
Does clinically significant extracranial bleeding increase the risk of functional disability in healthy older adults?
RCT (n=18,982)
Placebo-controlled
Randomized
Does clinically significant extracranial bleeding increase the risk of functional disability in healthy older adults?
Clinically significant extracranial bleeding in healthy older adults is associated with a more than twofold increased risk of developing functional disability and loss of independence.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May signal need to monitor ADL after extracranial bleeding in older adults; leaves open whether prevention preserves function.
BACKGROUND: Clinically significant extracranial bleeding, defined as bleeding at any site other than the brain or spinal cord requiring either a hospital admission >24 hours, red blood cell transfusion, surgery for hemostasis, or resulting in death, is a common side effect of antithrombotic agents. Compared to intracranial bleeding, the impact of clinically significant extracranial bleeding on long-term outcomes, including functional independence, has been poorly studied. OBJECTIVES: To determine if clinically significant extracranial bleeding impacts the development of functional disability in healthy older adults. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly trial. The primary outcome of this study was incident dependence in the Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), defined as being unable to perform or requiring assistance with any ADLs or being admitted to a long-term care facility. RESULTS: A total of 18 982 participants were included in the analysis, of which 547 (2.9%) developed clinically significant extracranial bleeding during study follow-up. In adjusted analyses, clinically significant extracranial bleeding was significantly associated with the development of incident ADL dependence (hazard ratio [HR], 2.46; 95% CI, 1.97-3.07). This finding was similar for gastrointestinal (HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.72-2.08) and nongastrointestinal extracranial bleeds (HR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.96-3.69). The association with increased risk of incident ADL dependence remained significant in secondary analysis of groups randomized to either aspirin (HR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.57-2.94) or placebo (HR, 2.84; 95% CI, 2.09-3.86). CONCLUSION: Clinically significant extracranial bleeding was associated with the development of incident ADL dependence in otherwise healthy older adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Healthy older adults (n=18,982). Clinically significant extracranial bleeding vs. No clinically significant extracranial bleeding was evaluated on incident dependence in the Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.97-3.07). Clinically significant extracranial bleeding was associated with an increased risk of incident ADL dependence in healthy older adults.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: