Key result
Acoustic assessment of Björk-Shiley convexo-concave heart valves detected single leg separation with a sensitivity of 1.00 (95% CI 0.79-1.00) and specificity of 0.69 (95% CI 0.41-0.89).
Why the study?
Does acoustic assessment accurately detect single leg separation in Björk-Shiley convexo-concave heart valves?
Observational (n=800)
Blinded
Does acoustic assessment accurately detect single leg separation in Björk-Shiley convexo-concave heart valves?
Acoustic assessment of Björk-Shiley convexo-concave heart valves provides high sensitivity for detecting single leg separation, serving as an effective preliminary screen.
May support noninvasive screening of Björk-Shiley valves; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Several lines of evidence indicate a two-stage failure mode for the Björk-Shiley convexo-concave (C/C) heart valve, in which one of the two outlet strut legs separates from the flange before the other, potentially providing an opportunity to identify and prophylactically replace failure-prone valves. Radiographic single leg separation (SLS) detection, although successful, is subjective and skill intensive, implying a need for both an objective preliminary screen and subsequent corroboration of the radiographic findings. METHODS AND RESULTS: We developed a time-windowed, power density analysis of C/C valve closing sounds to detect the vibrational resonance that characterizes the presence of an intact outlet strut in clinically functioning, 29-mm-flange size C/C valves. Recordings from more than 800 patients enrolled in radiographic SLS detection studies were analyzed, and the assessment algorithm was evaluated through a blinded test of 32 study valves for which the true status became known consequent to an autopsy or surgical explantation. Valves were objectively scored on a 0-to- 1 scale, with 1 being assuredly intact and scores of < 0.50 indicating a probable SLS. All except five valves (incorrectly designated probable SLS) were classified correctly, for a sensitivity of 1.00 (95% confidence interval, 0.79 to 1.00) and a specificity of 0.69 (0.41 to 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: This level of accuracy is sufficient to serve as an effective preliminary screen, potentially allowing a threefold concentration of SLS prevalence among the C/C valves of patients undergoing radiographic assessment. The value of acoustic classification in avoiding unnecessary operations prompted by false-positive radiographs is less certain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dow et al. (1997) conducted an observational in Björk-Shiley convexo-concave (C/C) heart valve (n=800). Acoustic assessment of valve closing sounds vs. True status (autopsy or surgical explantation) was evaluated on Detection of single leg separation (SLS) (Sensitivity 1.00, Specificity 0.69, 95% CI 0.79-1.00). Acoustic assessment of Björk-Shiley convexo-concave heart valves detected single leg separation with a sensitivity of 1.00 (95% CI 0.79-1.00) and specificity of 0.69 (95% CI 0.41-0.89).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: