Key result
Intensive antihypertensive therapy cuts stroke ~55% vs standard care in diabetic patients without CKD.
Why the study?
Does intensive antihypertensive therapy reduce cerebrovascular and other CVD outcomes in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes, and does baseline CKD modify this effect?
RCT (n=4,678)
randomized
Does intensive antihypertensive therapy reduce cerebrovascular and other CVD outcomes in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes, and does baseline CKD modify this effect?
Hazard Ratio: 0.447 (95% CI 0.227–0.88)
Intensive blood pressure control (<120 mm Hg) provides significant cerebrovascular protection in diabetic patients without CKD, with a potential but statistically non-significant benefit in those with mild-to-moderate CKD.
Supports intensive BP control for stroke prevention in T2DM without CKD; extends evidence by suggesting CKD may modify benefit and leaves efficacy open in that subgroup.
BACKGROUND: Persons with chronic kidney disease (CKD) represent a population prone to cardiovascular disease (CVD) but vulnerable to adverse medication effects. We assessed the impact of intensive antihypertensive therapy on the cerebrovascular and other CVD outcomes in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes and baseline CKD. METHODS: Using current guideline criteria, 1,726 (36.9%) of 4,678 participants in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) blood pressure (BP) arm had mild to moderate CKD (CKD1-3B) at baseline. Participants of this study were randomized to intensive (systolic <120 mm Hg) or standard (systolic <140 mm Hg) BP goals. Fatal and non-fatal stroke were pre-specified secondary outcomes of the ACCORD study. RESULTS: Total cerebrovascular events were significantly higher in participants with baseline CKD (0.66%/year) compared with participants free of CKD (0.28%/year). A significantly higher rate of events was observed in CKD participants. Intensive antihypertensive therapy in participants without CKD at baseline resulted in a 55% significant reduction of any stroke (hazard ratio 0.447; 95% CI 0.227-0.880) and a 50% reduction of non-fatal stroke (hazard ratio 0.498; 95% CI 0.250-0.993). In participants with CKD at baseline, the occurrence of any stroke was reduced by 38% (hazard ratio 0.623; 95% CI 0.361-1.074) and non-fatal stroke by 36% (hazard ratio 0.642; 95% CI 0.361-1.142). Test for interaction was NS between the 2 groups. Changes in other CVD outcomes did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that intensive antihypertensive therapy offers significant cerebrovascular protection in diabetic participants without CKD at baseline, but significant benefit to patients with CKD cannot be excluded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Papademetriou et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes (n=4,678). Intensive antihypertensive therapy vs. Standard antihypertensive therapy (systolic <140 mm Hg) was evaluated on Any stroke in participants without CKD (HR 0.447, 95% CI 0.227-0.880). Intensive antihypertensive therapy reduced any stroke by 55% in diabetic patients without CKD (HR 0.447; 95% CI 0.227-0.880), with a non-significant 38% reduction in those with baseline CKD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: