Key result
Rabeprazole plus aspirin was not inferior to rabeprazole plus clopidogrel for the successful treatment of aspirin-related symptomatic peptic ulcer disease (90.0% vs 86.2%; P=0.531).
Why the study?
Does rabeprazole plus aspirin prevent failure of peptic ulcer healing compared to rabeprazole plus clopidogrel in patients with aspirin-related nonbleeding symptomatic ulcers?
RCT (n=218)
randomised
Does rabeprazole plus aspirin prevent failure of peptic ulcer healing compared to rabeprazole plus clopidogrel in patients with aspirin-related nonbleeding symptomatic ulcers?
Absolute Event Rate: 90% vs 86.2%
p-value: p=0.531
Continuing aspirin with a proton pump inhibitor is non-inferior to switching to clopidogrel with a proton pump inhibitor for the healing of aspirin-related peptic ulcers.
Supports continuing aspirin with PPI over switching to clopidogrel; confirms non-inferiority for ulcer healing in this RCT.
BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel does not inhibit prostaglandin synthesis. As a result, clopidogrel's incidence of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and ulcer bleeding is lower than aspirin's. AIM: To compare the healing rate in aspirin-related dyspeptic ulcer patients who were given proton pump inhibitor (PPI) plus aspirin or PPI plus clopidogrel. METHODS: Patients with aspirin-related nonbleeding symptomatic ulcers were randomised to receive rabeprazole (20 mg/day) plus aspirin (100 mg/day) or rabeprazole (20 mg/day) plus clopidogrel (75 mg/day) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the successful treatment of PUD as characterised by intention-to-treat at the end of therapy. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighteen patients (109 in the aspirin group and 109 in the clopidogrel group) were enrolled. There were no statistical demographic differences between the group that received aspirin and the group that received clopidogrel. The PUD treatment success rate was also statistically equal between the clopidogrel and aspirin groups (86.2% vs. 90.0%, P = 0.531). Neither group experienced ulcer-related bleeding. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that large ulcer size (>10 mm) (OR: 6.29, 95% CI: 2.58-15.37) and past history of PUD (OR: 3.69, 95% CI: 1.24-10.97) were important predictors of unsuccessful therapy for aspirin-related PUD. CONCLUSIONS: Rabeprazole plus aspirin is not inferior to rabeprazole plus clopidogrel in treating aspirin-related symptomatic PUD. Large ulcer size (>10 mm) and past history of PUD are important predictors of unsuccessful therapy (NCT 01037491).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2011) conducted an RCT in aspirin-related peptic ulcer disease (n=218). rabeprazole plus aspirin vs. rabeprazole 20 mg/day plus clopidogrel 75 mg/day was evaluated on successful treatment of PUD as characterised by intention-to-treat at the end of therapy (p=0.531). Rabeprazole plus aspirin was not inferior to rabeprazole plus clopidogrel for the successful treatment of aspirin-related symptomatic peptic ulcer disease (90.0% vs 86.2%; P=0.531).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: