Key result
CNN models achieve up to ~94% testing accuracy for arrhythmia detection with variable heartbeat focus.
Why the study?
Deep learning models are accurate but function as black boxes, which hinders their clinical applications where reliable, explainable decisions are needed.
The study developed a metric to quantify the focus of deep learning models in ECG arrhythmia detection, aiming to improve the explainability of black-box models for clinical application.
Caution advised before clinical use due to limited model focus; hypothesis-generating for explainability metrics in arrhythmia AI.
In clinical practice, every decision should be reliable and explained to the stakeholders. The high accuracy of deep learning (DL) models pose a great advantage, but the fact that they function as black-boxes hinders their clinical applications. Hence, explainability methods became important as they provide explanation to DL models. In this study, two datasets with electrocardiogram (ECG) image representations of six heartbeats were built, one given the label of the last heartbeat and the other given the label of the first heartbeat. Each dataset was used to train one neural network. Finally, we applied well-known explainability methods to the resulting networks to explain their classifications. Explainability methods produced attribution maps where pixels intensities are proportional to their importance to the classification task. Then, we developed a metric to quantify the focus of the models in the heartbeat of interest. The classification models achieved testing accuracy scores of around 93.66% and 91.72%. The models focused around the heartbeat of interest, with values of the focus metric ranging between 8.8% and 32.4%. Future work will investigate the importance of regions outside the region of interest, besides the contribution of specific ECG waves to the classification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Varandas et al. (2022) studied Arrhythmia. Convolutional Neural Network was evaluated on Testing accuracy and focus metric. Convolutional neural network models for arrhythmia detection achieved testing accuracies of 91.72% and 93.66%, with focus metric values on the heartbeat of interest ranging from 8.8% to 32.4%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: