Key result
Global longitudinal strain did not significantly differ between heart failure etiologies, but was significantly worse in patients with reduced versus mildly reduced ejection fraction (-11.7% vs -14.9%, p<0.001).
Why the study?
There was no evidence whether global longitudinal strain properly differentiates etiologies in patients with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction <50%.
Does global longitudinal strain differentiate between etiologies of heart failure in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <50%?
Observational (n=147)
No
Does global longitudinal strain differentiate between etiologies of heart failure in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <50%?
Absolute Event Rate: -11.7% vs -14.9%
p-value: p=<0.001
Global longitudinal strain does not differentiate between underlying etiologies of heart failure in patients with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction.
Introduction: In patients with heart failure, global longitudinal strain (GLS) early detects decreased ventricular contractility, with prognostic value, but there is no evidence that GLS properly differentiates etiologies in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <50%. Methods and aims: 147 patients with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction <50% were included retrospectively. The aims were to compare the GLS in patients with heart failure with reduced (<40%) to those with mildly reduced ejection fraction (40-49%) and, to compare GLS between the different etiologies in each of these two subpopulations. Results: 78 patients presented mildly reduced (53%) and 69 reduced ejection fraction (47%). The mean GLS was -13.4% ± 3.3% (mildly reduced -14.9% ± 2.9%, reduced -11.7% ± 3.0%, p <0.001). In mildly reduced ejection fraction, the etiologies were ischemic (47.4%), idiopathic (25.6%), tachycardiomyopathy (12.8%), valvular (11.6%), and toxic (2.6%), with similar mean GLS (p = ns among all etiologies). In reduced ejection fraction, the etiology of 50.7% patients was ischemic, 24.6% idiopathic, 10.1% valvular, 8.7% tachycardiomyopathy, and 5.8% toxic, with similar mean GLS (p = ns among all etiologies). Conclusions: There were no significant differences in GLS between the etiologies of heart failure in any subpopulation. The reduced ejection fraction patients presented worse GLS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sutil‐Vega et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction <50% (n=147). Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) vs. Heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) was evaluated on Global longitudinal strain (GLS) (p=<0.001). Global longitudinal strain did not significantly differ between heart failure etiologies, but was significantly worse in patients with reduced versus mildly reduced ejection fraction (-11.7% vs -14.9%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: