PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 26, 2025European Journal of Pharmacology2 citationsOpen Access

Early sacubitril/valsartan therapy reduces ventricular remodeling and cardiac events in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction

View Full Paper
SYSuling YeNGNing GuoJLJie Li

Key Result

Early ARNI therapy significantly reduced the risk of major adverse cardiac events compared to ACEI/ARB in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction (HR 0.392; 95% CI 0.194-0.791; P=0.009).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=168)

Structured PICO

Does early sacubitril/valsartan therapy improve ventricular remodeling and reduce major adverse cardiac events compared to ACEI/ARB in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction?

P
Population
168 patients with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction treated with ARNI or ACEI/ARB, evaluated for up to 6-12 months.
E
Exposure
Early sacubitril/valsartan (angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor [ARNI]) therapy
C
Comparator
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB) therapy
O
Outcome
Left ventricular remodeling (including left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and relative wall thickness) and heart failure progressionsurrogate

Early initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction improves left ventricular remodeling and reduces the risk of major adverse cardiac events compared to ACEI/ARB therapy.

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 0.392 (95% CI 0.194–0.791)

p-value: p=0.009

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of early angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB) therapy on left ventricular remodeling and heart failure progression in patients with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction. METHODS: Patients were stratified by treatment into ARNI (n = 97) and ACEI/ARB (n = 71) groups. Baseline characteristics, cardiac ultrasound data (baseline, 0-3 months, 6-12 months), and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were analyzed. RESULTS: The ARNI group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and relative wall thickness versus the ACEI/ARB group. Subgroup analyses (target-dose achievers, emergency reperfusion recipients, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50 % patients) consistently showed better improvements with ARNI. ARNI therapy also significantly reduced MACEs risk (HR = 0.392, 95 % CI: 0.194-0.791, P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Compared with ACEI/ARB, ARNI demonstrated enhanced preservation of cardiac function, attenuation of adverse ventricular remodeling, and maintenance of ventricular geometry following myocardial infarction. Additionally, ARNI was associated with a reduction in major adverse cardiac events and improved survival outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ye et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in acute anterior wall myocardial infarction (n=168). Early angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) vs. angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB) was evaluated on major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (HR 0.392, 95% CI 0.194-0.791, p=0.009). Early ARNI therapy significantly reduced the risk of major adverse cardiac events compared to ACEI/ARB in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction (HR 0.392; 95% CI 0.194-0.791; P=0.009).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa2f199af3912bb9ae56579https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2025.178188
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper