Key result
Non-dipper hypertension is linked to ~20% higher TIMI frame counts than dippers, indicating coronary slow flow.
Why the study?
Coronary slow flow is linked to adverse cardiovascular outcomes, but research on the relationship between coronary slow flow and hypertension is limited.
Does a non-dipper blood pressure pattern increase coronary slow flow compared to a dipper pattern in hypertensive patients with normal coronary arteries?
Observational (n=71)
Single-blind
No
Does a non-dipper blood pressure pattern increase coronary slow flow compared to a dipper pattern in hypertensive patients with normal coronary arteries?
Non-dipper hypertension is associated with increased coronary slow flow compared to dipper hypertension in patients with normal coronary arteries.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Non-dipper pattern associated with higher coronary slow flow in observational data; leaves open whether ambulatory monitoring improves risk stratification.
OBJECTIVE: Coronary slow flow (CSF) is linked to myocardial ischemia, malignant arrhythmias, and cardiovascular mortality. On the other hand, hypertension (HTN) is an important risk factor for vascular disorders. There is limited research on the relationship between CSF and HTN. This study aimed to investigate TIMI frame count (TFC), which is an indicator of CSF, in dipper and non-dipper hypertensive individuals with normal coronary arteries. METHODS: The study was conducted as a retrospective observational study. Patients diagnosed with CSF and dipper or non-dipper hypertension were included in this study. Blood tests were routinely conducted for all patients. ECG was conducted for each patient, and echocardiography was performed. Coronary artery images were obtained in the CAG laboratory. Blood pressure (BP) measurements were obtained from the ambulatory Holter records. The patients were separated into two groups based on ambulatory Holter monitoring. The relationship between CSF and HTN was also examined. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients, comprising 25 women (37.2%) and 46 men (62.8%) with an average age of 52.75±9.42 years, were enrolled in the research. Based on ambulatory BP, the individuals were separated into two groups: non-dipper (n=36) and dipper (n=35). The pulse rate was significantly higher in the non-dipper group (p<0.001). In terms of mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, there were no substantial differences across the groups (p = 0.326 and p = 0.654, respectively). The daytime mean systolic and diastolic BP did not significantly differ across the groups (p = 0.842 and p = 0.421). The dipper group had substantially lower nighttime systolic and diastolic BP values (p <0.001). The LAD, Cx, and RCA TIMI frame scores were significantly lower in the dipper group (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study, non-dipper patients had a greater CSF rate than dipper.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özen et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Hypertension with normal coronary arteries (n=71). Non-dipper hypertension vs. Dipper hypertension was evaluated on Mean TIMI frame score (p=<0.001). Non-dipper hypertensive patients had a significantly higher mean TIMI frame count compared to dipper hypertensive patients (23.87 vs 19.87, p<0.001), indicating a greater rate of coronary slow flow.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: