Why the study?
Is non-dipper hypertension associated with higher TIMI frame count compared to dipper hypertension in patients with normal coronary angiograms?
Is non-dipper hypertension associated with higher TIMI frame count compared to dipper hypertension in patients with normal coronary angiograms?
Non-dipper hypertension is associated with slower coronary flow (higher TIMI frame count) in hypertensive patients with normal coronary arteries, suggesting microvascular changes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Non-dipper hypertension may signal microvascular impairment; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before guiding practice.
AIM: A person with a drop of more than 10% in nocturnal arterial blood pressure during the circadian rhythm is referred to as a dipper and one with a smaller decrease is referred to as a non-dipper. In our study, we aimed to compare the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count in non-dipper and dipper hypertensive patient groups who had normal coronary artery angiography. METHODS: Patients with normal coronary arteries and with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring follow ups were retrospectively investigated and 60 patients (35%, female) were included in our study. The patients were grouped as dipper (n = 30) and non-dipper (n = 30) hypertensives. RESULTS: in the dipper patient group, while it was 25.47 ± 2.92 in the non-dippers. BMI was found to be significantly higher in the non-dipper group than in the dipper group (p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: In this study, TIMI frame count, which is a simple, productive, objective and reproducible method for determination of microvascular changes, was found to be higher in non-dipper hypertensive patients than in the dipper patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akşıt et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: