Key result
Clinical nursing pathway for emergency PCI undergoes evaluation in a new randomized trial protocol.
Why the study?
Few studies have reported the implementation of a clinical nursing pathway in patients undergoing emergency PCI for acute myocardial infarction.
Does a clinical nursing pathway improve clinical outcomes and efficiency in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing emergency PCI?
RCT (n=100)
randomized
No
Does a clinical nursing pathway improve clinical outcomes and efficiency in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing emergency PCI?
This protocol outlines a randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether a clinical nursing pathway improves efficiency, costs, and clinical outcomes for patients undergoing emergency PCI for acute myocardial infarction.
RCT protocol tests nursing pathway in emergency PCI; leaves open effects on AMI outcomes and efficiency.
BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction is a very common disease in the emergency room. Emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the first choice to open infarct-related artery in time to regain the active blood flow of myocardial tissue. Clinical nursing pathway (CNP), namely clinical project, is an original nursing mode with good quality, outstanding efficiency, and low treatment spending, so it has attracted more and more attention. However, few studies have reported the implementation of a CNP in PCIs. The purpose of the protocol is to assess the impact of CNP on the clinical efficacy of transradial emergency PCI. METHODS: This is a randomized controlled, single center trial which will be implemented from January 2021 to June 2021. Hundred samples diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction will be included in this study. It was authorized via the Ethics Committee of Changshan County People's Hospital (CCPH002348). Patients are assigned to the following groups: control group, given normal routine care; CNP group, treated with CNP plan. The time from door to balloon, hospitalization expenses, length of stay, postoperative complications, patients' satisfaction with treatment are compared and analyzed. All data are collected and analyzed by Social Sciences software version 21.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) program. RESULTS: Differences of clinical outcomes between groups (). CONCLUSION: This original evidence-based nursing model can be used as the foundation for further research. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: researchregistry6030.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Acute myocardial infarction (n=100). Clinical nursing pathway (CNP) vs. Normal routine care was evaluated on Time from door to balloon, hospitalization expenses, length of stay, postoperative complications, and patients' satisfaction with treatment. A clinical nursing pathway for emergency percutaneous coronary intervention is being evaluated in this trial protocol, with no quantitative results reported.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: