Key result
Cervical spinal cord injury is linked to ~29% higher 24-hour systolic blood pressure variability.
Why the study?
Spinal cord injury above the sixth thoracic segment can disrupt autonomic cardiovascular control, leading to increased BP variability.
Cross-Sectional (n=80)
Yes
Effect estimate: η2 0.130
Absolute Event Rate: 18% vs 14%
p-value: p=0.004
Individuals with cervical spinal cord injury demonstrate significantly increased blood pressure variability, impaired nocturnal dipping, and higher susceptibility to hypotensive events compared to those with upper-thoracic injuries or non-injured controls.
BPV monitoring may inform risk stratification in cervical SCI; leaves open whether interventions targeting variability improve outcomes.
Background Spinal cord injury (SCI) above the sixth thoracic spinal cord segment can disrupt autonomic cardiovascular control, leading to increased BP variability (BPV). This study compared BPV, nocturnal dipping patterns, and blood pressure (BP) fluctuations among individuals with cervical SCI (C-SCI), upper-thoracic SCI (UT-SCI), and non-injured controls (NI-C). Methods Using 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, we analyzed BPV (via standard deviation [SD], coefficient of variation [CoV], average real variability [ARV], and variability independent of the mean [VIM]), nocturnal dipping, and systolic/diastolic BP fluctuations. Nocturnal dipping percentages were calculated and patterns classified. Hypotensive (SBP <100mmHg, DBP <70mmHg) and hypertensive (SBP >150mmHg per clinical guideline thresholds) events were identified. BP distribution was analyzed using skewness and kurtosis. Results Eighty participants (44 C-SCI, 19 UT-SCI, 17 NI-C) had 66 ± 18 measurements taken and are included in the analysis. The C-SCI group exhibited significantly higher systolic BPV metrics across SD, CoV, ARV, and VIM compared to the UT-SCI and NI-C groups ( P < 0.01). C-SCI nocturnal BP dips were reduced, and reverse dipping patterns were more prevalent ( P < 0.001). Hypotensive events occurred more frequently in C-SCI and UT-SCI compared to NI-C (both P < 0.001). SCI groups, particularly those with C-SCI, showed significantly more right-skewed SBP distributions and a higher proportion of non-Gaussian BP profiles, suggesting increased BP lability. Conclusion Individuals with C-SCI showed significantly increased BPV and impaired nocturnal dipping, while both C-SCI and UT-SCI demonstrated heightened susceptibility to hypotensive events. These findings highlight the need for targeted cardiovascular monitoring and interventions in individuals with C-SCI and UT-SCI to mitigate the known risks associated with BP dysregulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balthazaar et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Spinal cord injury (n=80). Cervical spinal cord injury vs. Upper-thoracic spinal cord injury and non-injured controls was evaluated on 24-hour systolic blood pressure variability (Standard Deviation) (η2 0.130, p=0.004). Individuals with cervical spinal cord injury exhibited significantly higher 24-hour systolic blood pressure variability and impaired nocturnal dipping compared to upper-thoracic and non-injured controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: