Key result
Chronic spinal cord injury is linked to worse executive function, driven by systemic hypotension.
Why the study?
The relationship between haemodynamic and cerebrovascular responses to orthostatic challenge and cognitive performance in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury was unclear.
Is there an association between hypotensive disturbances and cognitive functioning in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury compared to non-injured controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=26)
Is there an association between hypotensive disturbances and cognitive functioning in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury compared to non-injured controls?
Both transient orthostatic stress and resting hypotension in chronic spinal cord injury are linked with worse cognitive functioning, suggesting that the cumulative burden of systemic hypotension may contribute to cognitive impairment.
Systemic hypotension may contribute to executive dysfunction in spinal cord injury; leaves open whether BP stabilization improves cognition.
This study: (1) compared haemodynamic and cerebrovascular responses to an orthostatic challenge between individuals with a chronic (>1-year) cervical or upper-thoracic spinal cord injury (SCI) and non-injured controls, and examined whether these responses were associated with cognitive performance, and (2) explored whether habitual free-living blood pressure (BP) disturbances were associated with lower cognitive functioning. Thirteen individuals with SCI and 13 age- and sex-matched non-injured controls were recruited. Participants completed a motor-free neurocognitive test battery assessing working memory, attention/concentration/psychomotor speed, verbal fluency, and executive function. Laboratory assessments included a 20-min head-up tilt test with beat-by-beat cardiovascular and cerebrovascular monitoring, followed by 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring to capture free-living BP instability. After controlling for numerous confounders of cognition (i.e., age, education, weight, waist circumference, physical activity, depression, and traumatic brain injury), individuals with SCI performed worse in the executive function domain relative to the non-injured controls. Individuals with SCI exhibited lower resting BP and a greater degree of orthostatic hypotension, along with more hypotensive events in the 24-h free-living period, compared to the non-injured controls. These laboratory and free-living haemodynamic observations resulted in significant, moderate-to-large associations with performance in multiple neurocognitive assessments. Collectively, these exploratory findings indicate that both transient (i.e., orthostatic stress) and resting hypotension are linked with lower cognitive functioning following SCI, with comparable associations between laboratory and free-living environments. Given that the cumulative burden of systemic hypotension likely contributes to this cognitive impairment, future research should identify interventions capable of stabilising autonomic cardiovascular function to mitigate long-term neurocognitive decline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hodgkiss et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic cervical or upper-thoracic spinal cord injury (n=26). Chronic cervical or upper-thoracic spinal cord injury vs. Age- and sex-matched non-injured controls was evaluated on Cognitive performance (executive function) and haemodynamic/cerebrovascular responses (resting BP, orthostatic hypotension, 24-h hypotensive events). Chronic spinal cord injury was associated with worse executive function and more systemic hypotension, which correlated with lower cognitive functioning.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: