Key result
Higher E/E' by tissue Doppler imaging was significantly associated with higher NT-proBNP (rho 0.48, P=0.004) and hs-TnT (rho 0.37, P=0.03) in chronic hemodialysis patients.
Why the study?
Is the tissue Doppler imaging parameter E/E' associated with NT-proBNP and hs-TnT levels in chronic hemodialysis patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=35)
Is the tissue Doppler imaging parameter E/E' associated with NT-proBNP and hs-TnT levels in chronic hemodialysis patients?
In patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis, the tissue Doppler imaging parameter E/E' correlates better with cardiac biomarkers (NT-proBNP and hs-TnT) than traditional measures of diastolic dysfunction or ejection fraction.
BACKGROUND: Diastolic dysfunction is common and associated with higher mortality in the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) population. E/E', a measure derived from tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), is a correlate of left ventricular (LV) filling pressures. E/E' may be viewed as a confirmatory marker of diastolic dysfunction, but it is not routinely used to quantify diastolic dysfunction. Whether E/E' is associated with N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) or high sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) in this population is not known. METHODS: We performed echocardiograms and serology prior to the 2nd or 3rd dialysis session of the week on 35 chronic hemodialysis patients. We compared TDI parameters (E/E' and E' alone), traditional categories of diastolic function (normal, impaired, pseudonormal or restrictive), and ejection fraction (EF) as potential predictors of the outcomes NT-proBNP and hs-TnT. RESULTS: Higher E/E' was associated with higher NT-proBNP (rho 0.48, P = 0.004) and hs-TnT (rho 0.37, P = 0.03). EF did not have statistically significant associations with NT-proBNP (rho -0.2, P = 0.4) or hs-TnT (rho -0.24, P = 0.16). As compared to patients with normal diastolic function, those with impaired or pseudonormal filling patterns did not have significantly different levels of NT-proBNP (P = 0.46); patients in traditional categories of worsened diastolic function actually had lower hs-TnT (P = 0.02). The associations of E/E' with higher NT-proBNP and hs-TnT persisted after multivariate adjustment for EF, LV mass, and volume status. CONCLUSIONS: Tissue Doppler imaging may be more useful in evaluating cardiac function than traditional measures of diastolic dysfunction in the ESRD population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dubin et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in End-stage renal disease (n=35). Tissue Doppler imaging parameter E/E' vs. Traditional categories of diastolic function and ejection fraction was evaluated on NT-proBNP and hs-TnT levels (rho 0.48 (NT-proBNP) and rho 0.37 (hs-TnT), p=0.004 and 0.03). Higher E/E' by tissue Doppler imaging was significantly associated with higher NT-proBNP (rho 0.48, P=0.004) and hs-TnT (rho 0.37, P=0.03) in chronic hemodialysis patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: