Key result
LAAO demonstrates feasibility in HCM with AF, yielding a ~4% ischemic stroke rate.
Why the study?
Anticoagulation is recommended for stroke prevention in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and AF, but management poses a dilemma for patients with contraindications to anticoagulants.
Does percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion prevent ischemic stroke and systemic embolization in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=25)
Does percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion prevent ischemic stroke and systemic embolization in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation?
LAAO appears feasible and safe for stroke prevention in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation, though the 12.5% rate of device-related thrombus highlights a need for careful monitoring in this hemodynamically abnormal cohort.
LAAO may be feasible in HCM-AF; leaves open stroke prevention efficacy versus anticoagulation pending randomized trials.
Background: Prophylactic anticoagulation was recommended for stroke prevention in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy(HCM) and atrial fibrillation(AF) regardless of CHA2DS2-VASC score but the strategy was in a dilemma for patients with contraindication to antigulants. Aims: To estimate the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion(LAAO) in HCM patients with atrial fibrillation(AF). Methods and results: This prospective study included 25 HCM patients(age 70.04±11.62years, 72% male, 16/25(64.00%) had prior stroke) with AF eligible for LAAO. Clinical outcomes and echocardiographic parameters were collected and assessed during procedure and follow-up(3, 6, and 12months post-procedure). The composite safety outcomes included all-cause death, major bleeding and procedure-related complications. The primary efficacy outcome was defined as ischemic stroke and systemic embolization. Successful implantation was achieved in 24 patients(96%) using Watchman device without severe peri-device leaks (PDL), while one patient developed new-onset thrombus before access puncture on the operative day. Median follow-up was 1.5 years with a total of 38.1 patient-years. Only one patient experienced non-disabling ischemic stroke. The occurrence of major bleeding was 1/24(4.17%), with a remarkable reduction in annual 3 bleeding risk by 56.18% compared to the predicted rate. Device-related thrombus(DRT) was detected in 3/24(12.50%) patients. Neither serious procedure-related complications nor death events were reported in our study. Conclusion: Our study suggested the feasibility and safety of LAAO in HCM patients for stroke prevention. Whereas, thrombus formation remains a concern depending on hemodynamic abnormality associated with HCM. Further follow-up visits on larger sample size would facilitate the evaluation of LAAO in this high-risk cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with atrial fibrillation (n=25). Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) was evaluated on Ischemic stroke and systemic embolization. Left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation was feasible, with 1 ischemic stroke (4.17%) over a median 1.5 years of follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: