Key result
Ticagrelor-aspirin reduced new stroke risk versus clopidogrel-aspirin in patients without hypertension (4.8% vs 7.2%; HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.35-0.86), with no significant benefit in previous hypertension.
Why the study?
Hypertension is a risk factor for poor stroke outcomes and is associated with antiplatelet resistance, prompting an evaluation of ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin across different hypertension statuses.
Does ticagrelor-aspirin reduce stroke recurrence compared to clopidogrel-aspirin in patients with minor stroke or TIA carrying CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles across different hypertension statuses?
RCT (n=6,412)
randomized
Does ticagrelor-aspirin reduce stroke recurrence compared to clopidogrel-aspirin in patients with minor stroke or TIA carrying CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles across different hypertension statuses?
Hazard Ratio: 0.55 (95% CI 0.35–0.86)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.8% vs 7.2%
p-value: p=0.04 for interaction
In patients with minor stroke or TIA carrying CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles, the benefit of ticagrelor-aspirin over clopidogrel-aspirin in reducing stroke recurrence is significantly greater in those without hypertension compared to those with previous hypertension.
Ticagrelor-aspirin may be preferred over clopidogrel-aspirin in non-hypertensive CYP2C19 LOF carriers; extends hypertension-stratified guidance from prior trials.
Background: Hypertension is a risk factor of poor stroke outcomes and associated with antiplatelet resistance. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin in patients with different hypertension status, using randomized trial data from the CHANCE-2 trial (Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events-II). Methods: A total of 6412 patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack who carried CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles were enrolled and randomized to either ticagrelor-aspirin or clopidogrel-aspirin group. Hypertension status were classified into no, newly diagnosed, and previously diagnosed hypertension according to medical history, blood pressure, and antihypertensive medications during hospitalization. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were stroke recurrence and moderate to severe bleeding risk within 90-day follow-up. Results: Ticagrelor-aspirin was associated with reduced risk of new stroke in patients without hypertension (32 [4.8%] versus 60 [7.2%]; hazard ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.35–0.86]), but not in those with a newly diagnosed hypertension (20 [5.3%] versus 36 [9.1%]; hazard ratio 0.59 [95% CI, 0.33–1.07]), or those with a previously diagnosed hypertension (139 [7.0%] versus 147 [7.4%]; hazard ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.74–1.18]) compared with clopidogrel-aspirin ( P =0.04 for interaction). The risk of bleeding for ticagrelor-aspirin was not associated with hypertension status (0.1% versus 0.4%; 0.3% versus 0.5%, 0.4% versus 0.3%, P =0.50 for interaction). All the efficacy and safety outcomes between treatments did not differ by blood pressure levels on admission. Conclusions: In the CHANCE-2 trial, patients without hypertension received a significantly greater benefit from ticagrelor- aspirin than those with previous hypertension after minor stroke or transient ischemic attack, and a similar benefit trend was observed in those with newly diagnosed hypertension. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04078737.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in minor stroke or transient ischemic attack (n=6,412). Ticagrelor-aspirin vs. Clopidogrel-aspirin was evaluated on stroke recurrence within 90-day follow-up (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.35-0.86, p=0.04 for interaction). Ticagrelor-aspirin reduced new stroke risk versus clopidogrel-aspirin in patients without hypertension (4.8% vs 7.2%; HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.35-0.86), with no significant benefit in previous hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: