Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the impact of polycrystalline silicon (poly-Si) channel formation methods on the electrical characteristics of charge-trap flash (CTF) memory, with particular attention to their suitability for synaptic applications in neuromorphic systems. T wo types of poly-Si formation methods, low-pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) and solid-phase crystallization (SPC), were experimentally evaluated and compared. First, the surface roughness of SPC poly-Si was verified to be 9.39× lower than that of LPCVD poly-Si, effectively reducing local electric field concentration. This mitigates read disturbance and overprogramming effects, consequently enabling 2.29× more reliable conductance states. Second, a smaller grain size was confirmed in LPCVD poly-Si, contributing to reduced power consumption. However, the rough surface morphology of LPCVD poly-Si significantly limits its applicability in reliable analog operations. Therefore, the grain size of SPC poly-Si was further optimized by adjusting the annealing conditions, aiming to achieve low-power operation while maintaining superior analogue performance and reliability. As a result, it was confirmed that lower annealing temperatures resulted in smaller grain sizes, leading to a 60% reduction in drive current. Finally, CNN-based image classification on the CIFAR-10 data set demonstrated a 3.98% point improvement in inference accuracy with the SPC poly-Si-based CTF memory, confirming the effectiveness of SPC poly-Si for neuromorphic computing applications
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ryu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: