Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The effects of an α-Me 3 SiCH 2 group on the equilibrium acidities in DMSO of the acidic C−H bonds in esters, including ethyl thionacetate, diethyl malonate, and ethyl acetoacetate, were found to differ from that of an α-MeCH 2 group by less than 1 kcal/mol, pointing to little or no stabilizing effect of a β-Me 3 Si group on carbanion stabilities. On the other hand, substitution of an α-Me 3 SiCH 2 group for one of the acidic hydrogen atoms in these esters to give Me 3 SiCH 2 CH 2 C( S)OEt, Me 3 SiCH 2 CH(CO 2 Et) 2, and Me 3 SiCH 2 CH(CO 2 Et)COCH 3 was found to decrease the homolytic bond dissociation energies (BDEs) of the remaining acidic C−H bonds by 7.1, 8.2, and 7.1 kcal/mol, respectively, relative to those of the parent esters and by 2.7, 4.5, and 4.4 kcal/mol, respectively, relative to the BDEs of the acidic C−H bonds in the corresponding MeCH 2 -substituted esters. The differences in BDEs observed between the Me 3 SiCH 2 - and the MeCH 2 -substituted ester derivatives are indicative of the presence of 3−5 kcal/mol C−H bond stabilizing effects of β-Me 3 Si groups, relative to those of β-Me groups, on the corresponding carbon radicals. The BDE value of the acidic C−H bond in Me 3 CCH 2 CH 2 C( S)OEt was found to be 86.4 kcal/mol, which represents a 0.6 kcal/mol increase in BDE relative to that of the acidic C−H bond in MeCH 2 CH 2 C( S)OEt. This result demonstrates the absence of a stabilizing effect of a β- tert -butyl group on an open-chain carbon-centered radical. This is contrary to an apparent 6.4 kcal/mol C−H bond stabilizing effect of the β- tert -butyl group in 9-neopentylfluorene, relative to that in fluorene, which is attributed to the relief of steric strain in forming the radical.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: