Key result
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is linked to ~15% higher mean platelet volume versus controls.
Case-Control (n=218)
Absolute Event Rate: 9.1% vs 7.9%
p-value: p=.01
Mean platelet volume is elevated in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and correlates with septal thickness, suggesting increased platelet activation in this population.
Suggests increased platelet activation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; leaves open whether this biomarker.
Thromboembolic events may be seen in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). We investigated the mean platelet volume (MPV), an indicator of platelet activation in patients with HCM. This study included 112 patients with HCM, in which 40 were patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), and 106 were control participants. The MPV was significantly higher in patients with HCM than in controls (9.1 ± 0.3 vs 7.9 ± 0.3 fL, P = .01). In the subgroup analyses, MPV was also higher in patients with HOCM compared to those with hypertrophic nonobstructive cardiomyopathy (HNCM; 9.3 ± 0.3 vs 9.0 ± 0.2 fL, P = .01). Similarly, patients with HNCM had higher MPV values than controls (9.0 ± 0.2 vs 7.9 ± 0.3 fL, P = .01). The MPV was significantly and positively correlated with left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction (r = .42, P = .001) and septal thickness (r =.62, P = .001). In linear regression analysis, MPV was independently associated only with septal thickness (β = .07, 95% confidence interval: 0.04-0.09, P = .001). The MPV can be elevated in patients with HCM regardless of the obstruction of LVOT and may be associated with the severity of septal thickness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
İçli et al. (2013) conducted a case-control in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (n=218). Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy vs. Controls was evaluated on Mean platelet volume (MPV) (p=.01). Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was associated with a significantly higher mean platelet volume compared to controls (9.1 vs 7.9 fL, P=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: