Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Masurel, Nic (Dept. of Virology, Medical Faculty Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, Rotterdam, The Netherlands), and William M. Marine. Recycling of Asian and Hong Kong influenza A virus hemagglutinins in man. Am J Epidemiol 97: 44–49, 1973.—Pre-Asian/57 and post-Hong Kong/ 68 epidemic sera were studied for antibodies to A/Japan/305/57 (H2N2), A/Hong Kong/1/68 (H3N2), and A/Equine/63 (Heq2Neq2) viruses by the hemagglutination-inhibition test. The relationship of antibodies in pre-Asian/57 sera further established the hypothesis that a Hong Kong/ 68-like virus stimulated antibody cross-reacting asymmetrically with Hong Kong/68 and Equine/63 hemagglutinins. The lack of a predictable quantitative and qualitative relationship of Asian/57 and Hong Kong/68 antibodies in the pre-Asian/57 sera, together with the different timing of increase in prevalence to these two hemagglutinins, lead to a unified hypothesis for recycling of Asian/57-like and Hong Kong/68-like viruses. The positive relationship between Asian/57 and Hong Kong/68 antibodies in the pre-Asian/57 and post-Hong Kong/68 collection of sera is explained by the anamnestic stimulation of Asian/57 antibody. A hemagglutinin-mediated anamnestic response in Asian/57 antibody by Hong Kong/68 vaccine was confirmed in a group of young adults, using hemagglutinin-specific recomhinants. Although the data do not permit the exact timing of this recycling, we can be quite certain that influenza viruses with Asian/57-like and Hong Kong/68-like hemagglutinins occurred in the same sequence at the end of the 19th century as was seen in 1957 and 1968. The implications of this conclusion include the prediction that a Swine-like influenza A virus may recur in man by 1985–1990.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masurel et al. (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: