Key result
Abstract lacks quantitative findings on intermittent and transient bundle branch block.
Observational
This 1951 article discusses the clinical and electrocardiographic features of intermittent and transient bundle branch block.
Abstract lacks quantitative results; leaves open any current relevance of 1951 observations on transient bundle branch block.
Article1 November 1951INTERMITTENT AND TRANSIENT BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK: A CLINICAL AND ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC STUDYAVERY A. SANDBERG, M.D., JOSEPH WENER, M.D., ARTHUR M. MASTER, M.D., F.A.C.P., LEONARD SCHERLIS, M.D.AVERY A. SANDBERG, M.D., JOSEPH WENER, M.D., ARTHUR M. MASTER, M.D., F.A.C.P., LEONARD SCHERLIS, M.D.Author, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-35-5-1085 SectionsAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail ExcerptINTRODUCTIONShortly after the recognition of the pattern of bundle branch block in the animal and human electrocardiogram,1 it was demonstrated that such patterns were often associated with lesions of one or both branches of the bundle of His.2 Many investigators demonstrated that the presence of bundle branch block in the electrocardiogram was generally associated with a diseased heart.3, 4 Although many reports of bundle branch block have appeared in otherwise normal persons,5, 6 the majority of patients showing this pattern have definite cardiac involvement.7, 8The nature and significance of transient or paroxysmal bundle branch block were not clearly...Bibliography1. EppingerRothberger HCJ: Zur Analyse des Elektrokardiogramms, Wien. klin. Wchnschr. 22: 1091, 1909. Google Scholar2. EppingerStoerk HO: Zur Klinik des Elektrokardiogramms, Ztschr. f. klin. Med. 71: 157, 1910. Google Scholar3. Mahaim I: Le bloc de branches et l'anatomie pathologique, Rev. méd. de la Suisse Rom. 62: 318, 1942. Google Scholar4. Yater WM: Pathogenesis of bundle branch block: review of the literature; report of 16 cases with necropsy and of 6 cases with detailed histological study of the conduction system, Arch. Int. Med. 62: 1, 1938. CrossrefGoogle Scholar5. GraybielMcFarlandGatesWebster ARADCF: Analysis of the electrocardiograms obtained from 1000 young healthy aviators, Am. Heart J. 27: 524, 1944. CrossrefGoogle Scholar6. Fisch C: Bundle branch block of the broad S type: report of 11 cases without any existence of heart disease with one instance showing partial and transient block, J. Indiana M. A. 40: 1128, 1947. Google Scholar7. MasterKalterDackJaffe AMMSHL: The relation between bundle branch block and cardiac enlargement, Am. Heart J. 20: 186, 1940. CrossrefGoogle Scholar8. Sodi-PallaresBrumlikMendozaCabrera DJFE: Estudio de 125 cases de bloqueo de rama, Arch. Inst. cardiol. México 15: 241, 1945. Google Scholar9. WolffParkinsonWhite LJPD: Bundle branch block with short P-R interval in healthy young people prone to paroxysmal tachycardia, Am. Heart J. 5: 685, 1930. CrossrefGoogle Scholar10. ComeauHamiltonWhite WJJGPD: Paroxysmal bundle branch block associated with heart disease: a review and an analysis of the literature with 13 new cases and notes upon the influence of the vagus, Am. Heart J. 15: 276, 1938. CrossrefGoogle Scholar11. Baker BM: The effect of cardiac rate and the inhalation of oxygen on transient bundle branch block, Arch. Int. Med. 45: 814, 1930. CrossrefGoogle Scholar12. Katz LN: Electrocardiography, 1946, Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, Fig. 504. Google Scholar13. Benchimol AB: Bloqueio de ramo instavel, Arq. clín. 1: 483, 1945. Google Scholar14. Vesell H: Critical rates in ventricular conduction. Unstable bundle branch block, Am. J. M. Sc. 202: 198, 1941. CrossrefGoogle Scholar15. Lewis T: Certain physical signs of myocardial involvement, Brit. M. J. 1: 484, 1913. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar16. Hartwell AS: Intermittent bundle-branch block; its occurrence in a case of rheumatic fever, Proc. Staff Meet. Clin., Honolulu 11: 17, 1945. Google Scholar17. HerrmannAshman GR: Partial bundle branch block: a theoretical consideration of transient normal intraventricular conduction in the presence of apparently complete bundle branch block, Am. Heart J. 6: 375, 1931. CrossrefGoogle Scholar18. DanielopoluDanielescu DV: Lesions latentes des branches du faisceau auriculoventriculaire moyens de les deceler, Arch. d. mal. du coeur 14: 529, 1921. Google Scholar19. Slater SR: Partial bundle branch block; a case of three-to-one and four-to-one block, Am. Heart J. 5: 617, 1930. CrossrefGoogle Scholar20. Stenström N: Further experience in incomplete bundle branch block, Acta med. Scandinav. 67: 353, 1927. CrossrefGoogle Scholar21. Master AM: The two-step exercise electrocardiogram for coronary insufficiency, Ann. Int. Med. 32: 842, 1950. LinkGoogle Scholar22. LevyWilliamsBruennCarr RLNEMGMA: The "anoxemia test" in the diagnosis of coronary insufficiency, Am. Heart J. 21: 634, 1931. CrossrefGoogle Scholar23. ScherlisSandbergWenerMasterGrishman LAAJAMA: The RS-T segment displacement in induced coronary insufficiency as studied with esophageal leads, Circulation 2: 598-603 (Oct.) 1950. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar24. Lewis T: The mechanism and graphic registration of the heart beat, 1925, Shaw and Sons, London. Google Scholar25. WilsonMacleodBarker FNAGPS: The order of ventricular excitation in human bundle branch block, Am. Heart J. 7: 305, 1932. CrossrefGoogle Scholar26. Hewlett AW: A case showing bundle branch block with extrasystoles originating in the ventricular septum, Heart 9: 1, 1921. Google Scholar27. SimonLangendorf AJR: Intraventricular block with ectopic beats approaching normal QRS duration, Am. Heart J. 27: 345, 1944. CrossrefGoogle Scholar28. WilsonHerrmann FNGR: An experimental study of incomplete bundle branch block and of the refractory period of the heart of the dog, Heart 8: 229, 1921. Google Scholar29. SegersDenolinDelatte MHE: Deux cas de bloc de branche intermittent, Acta cardiol. 3: 219, 1948. MedlineGoogle Scholar30. ScherlisWenerGrishmanSandberg LJAAA: The ventricular complex in esophageal electrocardiography, Am. Heart J. 41: 246, 1951. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar31. SandbergWenerScherlis AAJL: Left ventricular cavity potentials in induced left bundle branch block studied with esophageal leads, Am. Heart J. 40: 531-544 (Oct.) 1950. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar32. Gonzalez-SabathieGasparyRojas LFVRA: Bloqueos intraventriculares inestables, Rev. argent. de cardiol. 11: 297, 1944. Google Scholar33. MasterDackJaffe AMSHL: Bundle branch and intraventricular block in acute coronary artery occlusion, Am. Heart J. 16: 283, 1938. CrossrefGoogle Scholar34. Boyer NH: Paroxysmal bundle branch block converted into two-to-one bundle branch block by means of atropine; case report, Am. Heart J. 18: 115, 1939. CrossrefGoogle Scholar35. Ortiz EG: Bloques de rama transitorio, Medicina, Madrid 13: 166, 1945. Google Scholar36. Digilio VA: Reversible bundle-branch block in case of toxic goiter, Am. Heart J. 15: 116, 1938. CrossrefGoogle Scholar37. PackardGraybiel JMA: Bundle branch block as a temporary phenomenon in thyrotoxicosis, Am. Heart J. 39: 144, 1950. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar38. Baark V: Case of intermittent branch block in a patient with a myasthenia gravis, Acta med. Scandinav. 121: 295, 1945. CrossrefGoogle Scholar39. Sokolow M: Bundle-branch block in quinine poisoning; report of case, U. S. Nav. M. Bull. 45: 737, 1945. Google Scholar40. BarkerJohnstonWilson PSFDFN: The effect of quinidine upon sinus tachycardia, including the production of transient bundle branch block, Am. Heart J. 25: 760, 1943. CrossrefGoogle Scholar41. WenerScherlisSandberg JLAA: The spread of the excitatory process and the left ventricular cavity potentials in left bundle branch block as studied with esophageal leads, Am. Heart J. 41: 864, 1951. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar42. Geill T: Partieller Schenkelblock, Acta med. Scandinav. 109: 412, 1941. CrossrefGoogle Scholar43. Rasario GM: Sui blocchi di branca instabili, Cuore e circolaz. 24: 139, 1940. Google Scholar44. Hansen AT: On intraventricular conduction disturbances in the specific conduction system of the heart, Acta med. Scandinav. 117: 104, 1944. CrossrefGoogle Scholar45. WilsonJohnstonHillMacleodBarker FNFDJGAGPS: The significance of electrocardiograms characterized by an abnormally long QRS interval and by broad S-deflections in Lead I, Am. Heart J. 9: 459, 1934. CrossrefGoogle Scholar46. Stefanutti P: Alternanza electrica successiva a blocco di branca intermittente, Cuore e circolaz. 24: 202, 1940. Google Scholar47. Sanabria A: Bloqueos de rama transitorios o intermitentes, Bol. hosp., Caracas 43: 18, 1944. Google Scholar48. Nichols E: Transient right bundle branch block, wide S-wave type, in which normal conduction occurred both spontaneously and in response to vagal stimulation, Ann. Int. Med. 30: 196, 1949. LinkGoogle Scholar49. WoodJeffersWolferth FCWACC: Follow-up study of 64 patients with a right bundle branch conduction defect, Am. Heart J. 10: 1056, 1935. CrossrefGoogle Scholar50. DurantGinsburgRoesler TMIWH: Transient bundle branch block and other electrocardiographic changes in pulmonary embolism, Am. Heart J. 17: 423, 1939. CrossrefGoogle Scholar51. Steinmann B: Beitrag zur Kenntnis des Schenkelblockelektrokardiogramms, Ztschr. f. Kreislaufforsch. 33: 345, 1941. Google Scholar52. Stenström N: On a peculiar appearance of the ventricular electrocardiogram presumably caused by combination of hemisystoles, Acta med. Scandinav. 65: 474, 1926. CrossrefGoogle Scholar This content is PDF only. To continue reading please click on the PDF icon. Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: *Received for publication August 29, 1950.From the Cardiographic Department of The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, N. Y.†Now at the Department of Medicine, University of Utah College of Medicine. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics Cited byTransient resolution of chronic right bundle branch block in the acute phase of myocardial infarctionCardiac Aberrancy Triggered by Respiratory Sinus ArrhythmiaUnstable Intraventricular Conduction DisordersExercise-induced left bundle branch block and its relation to coronary artery diseaseTransient tachycardia- and bradycardia-dependent left anterior and left posterior hemiblocks. Effects of isoproterenolInitial ventricular activation in left-sided intraventricular conduction defects.Intermittent Left Bundle Branch Block in the Athletic Heart SyndromeT-wave changes secondary to left anterior hemiblock as shown by study of intermittent and alternating patternsEectrophysiological observations in pateints with rate dependent bundle branch block.Rate Dependent AberrancyDisappearance of bundle branch block with slowing of normal heart rateIntermittent left bundle branch blockCycle Length-Dependent Left and Right Bundle Branch Block and Left Anterior HemiblockAtrial Flutter with 2:1 A-V Conduction and Mobitz Type II-Like Block in the Left Bundle BranchFive cases of intermittent left anterior hemiblockCase 1-1969Transient Bundle-Branch BlockBUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK UNDER VOLUNTARY CONTROLBUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK: SOME USUAL AND SOME UNUSUAL FEATURESHemodynamic studies during intermittent left bundle branch blockRight bundle branch block following open heart surgeryRight bundle branch system block in healthy young people2:1 bundle branch block∗Die Rhythmusstörungen des Herzens (einschließlich der intramuralen Leitungsstörungen und des Alternans)Intermittent "normal" ventricular conduction appeering in left bundle branch block: A vectorcardiographic studyIntermittent right bundle branch block without apparent heart diseaseBilateral bundle branch blockELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC CHANGES AFTER NEPHRECTOMYCritical rates in ventricular conduction. IV 1 November 1951Volume 35, Issue 5Page: 1085-1109KeywordsElectrocardiographyHeart diseasesHospital medicineLesions Issue Published: 1 November 1951 PDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sandberg et al. (1951) conducted an observational in Intermittent and transient bundle branch block. Intermittent and transient bundle branch block was evaluated. The abstract provides only an introduction excerpt and bibliography, containing no quantitative results or findings regarding intermittent and transient bundle branch block.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: