⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

September 1, 1974Annals of Internal Medicine

To Pace or Not to Pace

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Why the study?

Should patients with bifascicular block have prophylactic permanent pacemaker insertion?

Population

Patients with bifascicular block (combined right bundle-branch block and left anterior hemiblock)

Design

Editorial

Authors

NDNicholas P. DePasqualeLenox Hill Hospital

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

This 1974 editorial discusses the clinical dilemma of whether to prophylactically pace patients with bifascicular block.

Structured PICO

Should patients with bifascicular block have prophylactic permanent pacemaker insertion?

P

Population

Patients with bifascicular block (combined right bundle-branch block and left anterior hemiblock)

I

Intervention

Prophylactic permanent pacemaker insertion

This 1974 editorial discusses the clinical dilemma of whether to prophylactically pace patients with bifascicular block.

Cite This Study

Nicholas P. DePasquale (1974) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8a624a176d2ac34cfbd86d https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-81-3-395

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Relationship of Right Bundle-Branch Block and Marked Left Axis Deviation (with Left Parietal or Peri-infarction Block) to Complete Heart Block and Syncope1968 · 180 citations
2Histopathological examination of concept of left hemiblock.1972 · 236 citations