Key result
Late sevoflurane post-conditioning shows no benefit over propofol for 6-month cardiac events after surgery.
Why the study?
Does late post-conditioning with sevoflurane reduce cardiac events in patients after cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation?
Cohort (n=94)
Single-blind (researchers gathering data were blinded)
Computer-generated (in primary RCT)
No
Does late post-conditioning with sevoflurane reduce cardiac events in patients after cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation?
Odds Ratio: 1.15 (95% CI 0.49–2.66)
Absolute Event Rate: 39% vs 36%
p-value: p=0.75
Late post-conditioning with sevoflurane after cardiac surgery did not significantly reduce the occurrence of cardiac or non-cardiac events at 6 months compared to propofol sedation, despite previous evidence of reduced cardiomyocyte damage.
Does not support late sevoflurane post-conditioning to reduce post-surgical cardiac events; leaves open efficacy of conditioning strategies in randomized trials.
INTRODUCTION: In a recent randomized controlled trial our group has demonstrated in 102 patients that late post-conditioning with sevoflurane performed in the intensive care unit after surgery involving extracorporeal circulation reduced damage to cardiomyocytes exposed to ischemia reperfusion injury. On the first post-operative day the sevoflurane patients presented with lower troponin T values when compared with those undergoing propofol sedation. In order to assess possible clinical relevant long-term implications in patients enrolled in this study, we performed the current retrospective analysis focusing on cardiac and non-cardiac events during the first 6 months after surgery. METHODS: All patients who had successfully completed the late post-conditioning trial were included into this follow-up. Our primary and secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients experiencing cardiac and non-cardiac events, respectively. Additionally, we were interested in assessing therapeutic interventions such as initiation or change of drug therapy, interventional treatment or surgery. RESULTS: Of 102 patients analyzed in the primary study 94 could be included in this follow-up. In the sevoflurane group (with 41 patients) 16 (39%) experienced one or several cardiac events within 6 months after cardiac surgery, in the propofol group (with 53 patients) 19 (36%, p=0.75). Four patients (9%) with sevoflurane vs. 7 (13%) with propofol sedation had non-cardiac events (p=0.61). While a similar percentage of patients suffered from cardiac and/or non-cardiac events, only 12 patients in the sevoflurane group compared to 20 propofol patients needed a therapeutic intervention (OR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.04-1.43, p=0.12). A similar result was found for hospital admissions: 2 patients in the sevoflurane group had to be re-admitted to the hospital compared to 8 in the propofol group (OR 0.23, 95% CI: 0.04-1.29, p=0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane does not seem to provide protection with regard to the occurrence of cardiac and non-cardiac events in the 6-month period following cardiac surgery with the use of extracorporeal circulation. However, there was a clear trend towards fewer interventions (less need for treatment, fewer hospital admissions) associated with sevoflurane post-conditioning in patients experiencing any event. Such results might encourage launching large multicenter post-conditioning trials with clinical outcome defined as primary endpoint.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bonvini et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Postoperative cardiac and non-cardiac events after cardiac surgery (n=94). Late post-conditioning with sevoflurane vs. Propofol sedation was evaluated on Proportion of patients experiencing cardiac events (dysrhythmias, congestive heart failure, and cardiac ischemic event) (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.49-2.66, p=0.75). Late post-conditioning with sevoflurane did not significantly reduce the incidence of cardiac events within 6 months after cardiac surgery compared to propofol sedation (39% vs 36%, OR 1.15, p=0.75).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: