Key result
Higher urinary proteomic classifier HF1 links to ~38% greater odds of impaired LV relaxation per SD.
Why the study?
Do urinary proteomic classifiers (HF1 and HF2) correlate with subclinical diastolic left ventricular dysfunction in a general population?
Cross-Sectional (n=745)
Do urinary proteomic classifiers (HF1 and HF2) correlate with subclinical diastolic left ventricular dysfunction in a general population?
Odds Ratio: 1.38 (95% CI 1.01–1.88)
p-value: p=0.043
Urinary proteomic classifiers HF1 and HF2 correlate with echocardiographic markers of diastolic LV dysfunction in a general population, suggesting potential utility for early diagnosis.
HF1 association with impaired relaxation warrants no practice change; leaves open proteomic screening for subclinical diastolic dysfunction.
BACKGROUND: In previous studies, we identified two urinary proteomic classifiers, termed HF1 and HF2, which discriminated subclinical diastolic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction from normal. HF1 and HF2 combine information from 85 and 671 urinary peptides, mainly up- or down-regulated collagen fragments. We sought to validate these classifiers in a population study. METHODS: In 745 people randomly recruited from a Flemish population (49.8 years; 51.3% women), we measured early and late diastolic peak velocities of mitral inflow (E and A) and mitral annular velocities (e' and a') by conventional and tissue Doppler echocardiography, and the urinary proteome by capillary electrophoresis coupled with mass spectrometry. RESULTS: In the analyses adjusted for sex, age, body mass index, blood pressure, heart rate, LV mass index and intake of medications, we expressed effect sizes per 1-SD increment in the classifiers. HF1 was associated with 0.204 cm/s lower e' peak velocity (95% confidence interval, 0.057-0.351; p=0.007) and 0.145 higher E/e' ratio (0.023-0.268; p=0.020), while HF2 was associated with a 0.174 higher E/e' ratio (0.046-0.302; p=0.008). According to published definitions, 67 (9.0%) participants had impaired LV relaxation and 96 (12.9%) had elevated LV filling pressure. The odds of impaired relaxation associated with HF1 was 1.38 (1.01-1.88; p=0.043) and that of increased LV filling pressure associated with HF2 was 1.38 (1.00-1.90; p=0.052). CONCLUSIONS: In a general population, the urinary proteome correlated with diastolic LV dysfunction, proving its utility for early diagnosis of this condition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (n=745). Urinary proteomic classifiers (HF1 and HF2) vs. Lower levels of urinary proteomic classifiers was evaluated on Impaired LV relaxation (per 1-SD increment in HF1) (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.01-1.88, p=0.043). In a general population, a 1-SD increment in the urinary proteomic classifier HF1 was associated with a 38% higher odds of impaired left ventricular relaxation (OR 1.38).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: