Key result
Contemporary PCI is linked to ~86% higher procedural success vs earlier eras.
Why the study?
Does the contemporary stent era improve procedural success and reduce in-hospital adverse events compared to earlier eras in patients undergoing PCI?
Cohort (n=20,884)
Does the contemporary stent era improve procedural success and reduce in-hospital adverse events compared to earlier eras in patients undergoing PCI?
Odds Ratio: 1.86
p-value: p=<0.0001
The availability of contemporary stents has significantly improved PCI success rates and reduced the need for emergency CABG, leaving no-reflow and uncrossable total occlusions as the primary remaining causes of failure.
Supports higher PCI success with contemporary stents in observational data; leaves open causal effects on outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, mechanisms, and in-hospital outcomes after failed percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: The most common causes of PCI failure are severe dissection, no-reflow, and uncrossable total occlusions. METHODS: Demographic, clinical, procedural, and quality assurance data were recorded in a prospective database to determine the incidence and outcome of failed PCI. Data were analyzed according to the year of PCI: prestent era (PSE 1993-1995), first generation stent era (FGSE 1996-2000), and contemporary stent era (CSE 2000-2003). RESULTS: PCI (20,884) were performed over a 10-year-period from 1993 through 2003, including 4,344 (20.8%) in the PSE, 9,114 (43.6%) in the FGSE, and 7,426 (35.6%) in the CSE; 19,171 (91.8%) were successful and 1,704 (8.2%) were failures. Nearly 90% of PCI failures are due to no-reflow or uncrossable total occlusions. Among PCI failures, 7.5% were treated medically and 0.7% required emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (ECABG). PCI success was independently associated with PCI during CSE (OR 1.86, P < 0.0001). ECABG decreased sixfold from 1.2% in the PSE to 0.2% in the CSE. CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary PCI patients have better procedural outcomes and fewer in-hospital adverse events than patient treated before the availability of stents. However, recanalization of total occlusions and avoiding no-reflow will have the most impact on future PCI success.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mattichak et al. (2008) conducted a cohort in Percutaneous coronary intervention (n=20,884). Contemporary stent era (2000-2003) vs. Prestent era (1993-1995) and first generation stent era (1996-2000) was evaluated on PCI success (OR 1.86, p=<0.0001). Percutaneous coronary intervention during the contemporary stent era was independently associated with higher procedural success compared to earlier eras (OR 1.86, P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: