Key result
Upstroke time at the ankle was prolonged (≥ 180 milliseconds) and helped suspect lower-extremity peripheral artery disease in two patients with falsely normalized ankle-brachial index.
Why the study?
The oscillometric ankle-brachial index can be falsely normalized in lower-extremity peripheral artery disease due to arterial incompressibility, potentially leading to missed diagnoses or underestimation of cardiovascular risk.
Does upstroke time at the ankle help detect peripheral artery disease in patients with falsely normalized ankle-brachial index?
Case Report (n=2)
No
Does upstroke time at the ankle help detect peripheral artery disease in patients with falsely normalized ankle-brachial index?
Upstroke time at the ankle can help identify peripheral artery disease in patients with falsely normalized ankle-brachial index due to arterial calcification.
May aid PAD detection when ABI is falsely normal due to calcification; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: The ankle-brachial index measurement is used for screening and diagnosis of lower-extremity peripheral artery disease and cardiovascular risk assessment. However, the value is occasionally unreliable since the oscillometric ankle-brachial index can be elevated and falsely normalized despite the presence of lower-extremity peripheral artery disease because of the incompressibility of infrapopliteal arteries at the ankle, potentially leading to a missed diagnosis of lower-extremity peripheral artery disease or underestimation of cardiovascular risk. CASE PRESENTATION: We report two cases of lower extremity peripheral artery disease with normal ankle-brachial index (a 76-year-old Asian man and a 66-year-old Asian man). In both cases, the ankle-brachial index was within the normal range (1.00-1.40) despite the presence of lower-extremity peripheral artery disease, whereas upstroke time at the ankle calculated from the pulse volume waveform simultaneously obtained by plethysmography during the ankle-brachial index measurement was prolonged (≥ 180 milliseconds). Diagnostic imaging tests revealed the presence of occlusive arterial disease in the lower extremity and severe calcification of infrapopliteal arteries. CONCLUSIONS: In both cases, the oscillometric ankle-brachial index might have been falsely normalized despite the presence of lower-extremity peripheral artery disease because of calcified incompressible infrapopliteal arteries. Sole reliance on the ankle-brachial index value may lead to a missed diagnosis of lower-extremity peripheral artery disease or underestimation of cardiovascular risk. Upstroke time at the ankle was helpful for suspecting the presence of lower-extremity peripheral artery disease in both patients with normal ankle-brachial index. In addition to history-taking and vascular examination, upstroke time at the ankle should be carefully checked for accurate diagnosis of peripheral artery disease and cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with normal ankle-brachial index.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maruhashi et al. (2021) conducted a case report in Lower-extremity peripheral artery disease with type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=2). Upstroke time measurement at the ankle vs. Ankle-brachial index (ABI) was evaluated on Upstroke time at the ankle. Upstroke time at the ankle was prolonged (≥ 180 milliseconds) and helped suspect lower-extremity peripheral artery disease in two patients with falsely normalized ankle-brachial index.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: