Key result
Review highlights hepatic nitric oxide synthase regulation as critical for treating liver diseases.
Understanding the molecular mechanisms governing nitric oxide synthesis in the liver is critical for developing strategies to manipulate NO production in liver diseases.
Should not change liver disease management; leaves open nitric oxide synthase as a therapeutic target.
Nitric oxide signalling during the past two decades has been one of the most rapidly growing areas in biology. This simple free radical gas can regulate an ever-growing list of biological processes. Here the regulation of NO synthesis in the liver is reviewed. The biogenesis of nitric oxide (NO) is catalysed by nitric oxide synthases (NOS). These enzymes catalyse the oxidation of one of the guanidino nitrogens of l-arginine by molecular oxygen to form NO and citrulline. Three NOS have been identified: two constitutive (cNOS: type 1 or neuronal and type 3 or endothelial) and one inducible (iNOS: type 2). As to the liver, cNOS activity is normally detectable in Kupffer cells, whereas no cNOS is ever encoded in hepatocytes. However, hepatocytes, Kupffer and stellate cells (the three main types of liver cells) are prompted to express an intense iNOS activity once exposed to effective stimuli such as bacterial lipopolysaccharide and cytokines. This review is focused mainly on two aspects: regulation of NOS activity and expression by endogenous and exogenous compounds. Because NO production has beneficial and detrimental effects, understanding the molecular mechanisms that govern NOS is critical to developing strategies to manipulate NO production in liver diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pablo Muriel (2000) conducted a review in Liver diseases. Nitric oxide synthesis regulation was evaluated. This review summarizes the regulation of nitric oxide synthase activity and expression in the liver, highlighting the critical need to understand these mechanisms for treating liver diseases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: